Re: Bash patches format

From	"Marty E. Plummer" <hanetzer@startmail.com>
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: Bash patches format
Date	2018-05-30 20:08 -0500
Message-ID	<mailman.839.1527728991.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<20180519134601.u3dfrjzip3do7daj@proprietary-killer> <2b5ce5fe-3250-ba63-4ad7-0326ac5a5707@case.edu> <20180530002542.dpwb756slvtjgtxu@proprietary-killer> <7c62d918-902f-e9f7-2672-00b1f01f62ca@case.edu>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:15:04AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/29/18 8:25 PM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> 
> >> If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for their
> >> own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
> >> change the format I use.
> >>
> > Could I at least convince you to start doing -p1, if not unified?
> 
> Why -p1?
> 
Well, as I said, debian and fedora convert to -p1 unified, as current
debian packages using the quilt 3.0 format expect -p1; I'm unsure as to
the rationale for fedora doing it. And gentoo expects -p1 by default for
patches applied by eapply (though you can specify -p0 in the ebuild, it
is a deviation from the defaults).

I don't believe debian actually needs a unified diff, but quilt 3.0
requires -p1 (see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00368.html).
> -- 
> ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
> 		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
> Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Bash patches format "Marty E. Plummer" <hanetzer@startmail.com> - 2018-05-30 20:08 -0500

csiph-web