Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16526

Re: An xtrace variant

From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: An xtrace variant
Date 2020-07-02 11:34 -0400
Organization ITS, Case Western Reserve University
Message-ID <mailman.826.1593704106.2574.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <87wo3pz3qo.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <d5a3d131-9479-c3fc-491a-bd5f6b7198db@case.edu>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/29/20 10:28 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> writes:
>> The NetBSD sh (this time alone I believe) also has a -X (not that part, I
>> think one or two other shells also have unrelated -X options) which acts
>> just like -X, except it locks the output to stderr as it is at the time
>> the -X option is enabled (until -X is unset).  [...]
> 
> I can see significant benefits to that.  At times, I've been thwarted in
> tracing things by redirection of stderr.

exec {BASH_XTRACEFD}>/tmp/trace-file
set -x


-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: An xtrace variant Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2020-07-02 11:34 -0400

csiph-web