Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11340

Re: -e does not take effects in subshell

Path csiph.com!au2pb.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.ripco.com!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: -e does not take effects in subshell
Date Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:51:17 -0400
Lines 22
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.8249.1439473895.904.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <BLU176-W28809FB59FF9274B34D871D67F0@phx.gbl> <20150811135056.GD4309@eeg.ccf.org> <BLU176-W27103575D91F4EF315336FD67D0@phx.gbl> <55CC26A7.10000@redhat.com> <CAAZkfoLbzLnY1V6tXc_frY0v3e2_++Hm6ikiMxW=z3ED7xYXkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To chet.ramey@case.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1439473896 23628 208.118.235.17 (13 Aug 2015 13:51:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc "bug-bash@gnu.org" <bug-bash@gnu.org>, chet.ramey@case.edu
To isabella parakiss <izaberina@gmail.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status N1110
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
In-Reply-To <CAAZkfoLbzLnY1V6tXc_frY0v3e2_++Hm6ikiMxW=z3ED7xYXkQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Junkmail-Status score=10/50, host=mpv5.cwru.edu
X-Junkmail-Whitelist YES (by domain whitelist at mpv2.tis.cwru.edu)
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic]
X-Received-From 129.22.105.37
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.14
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11340

Show key headers only | View raw


On 8/13/15 1:35 AM, isabella parakiss wrote:
> On 8/13/15, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Like it or not, it is the historical behavior standardized by POSIX. It
>> is NOT intuitive, and our advice is "DON'T USE set -e - IT WON'T DO WHAT
>> YOU WANT".  We can't change the behavior, because it would break scripts
>> that rely on the POSIX-specified behavior.
>>
> POSIX didn't say anything about shopt set-e-that-actually-makes-sense.

Sure, all it needs is a specification with the same rigor as Posix's.
There have been a couple of attempts to do that so far, but they haven't
been articulated well enough to differentiate from set -e or to
implement.  I encourage folks to take another shot at specifying their
requirements for something `that actually makes sense', and `not sucking'
isn't sufficient.

Chet
-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: -e does not take effects in subshell Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2015-08-13 09:51 -0400

csiph-web