Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11337
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: -e does not take effects in subshell |
| Date | Wed, 12 Aug 2015 23:09:59 -0600 |
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Lines | 47 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8234.1439442606.904.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <BLU176-W28809FB59FF9274B34D871D67F0@phx.gbl> <20150811135056.GD4309@eeg.ccf.org> <BLU176-W27103575D91F4EF315336FD67D0@phx.gbl> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LA32DePxlVLtB5OREf6dhTM10iI3KNt7I" |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1439442607 6053 208.118.235.17 (13 Aug 2015 05:10:07 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| Cc | "bug-bash@gnu.org" <bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| To | PRC <ijkxyz@msn.com>, Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Openpgp | url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <BLU176-W27103575D91F4EF315336FD67D0@phx.gbl> |
| X-Scanned-By | MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x |
| X-Received-From | 209.132.183.28 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.14 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11337 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 08/12/2015 09:54 PM, PRC wrote: > 1. If the function is complicated and contains lots of commands, it > would be more troublesome appending && to every command rather > than simply using one single "set -e" at the front. > 2. It is not > reasonable that suppression of '-e' is applied as well inside the > function. My intention is if my_build succeeds continue to do other > stuff. Does anyone like the rule that a function never fails only if it is part of a > compound command? Like it or not, it is the historical behavior standardized by POSIX. It is NOT intuitive, and our advice is "DON'T USE set -e - IT WON'T DO WHAT YOU WANT". We can't change the behavior, because it would break scripts that rely on the POSIX-specified behavior. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: -e does not take effects in subshell Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> - 2015-08-12 23:09 -0600
csiph-web