Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14540

Re: Add sleep builtin

Path csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Add sleep builtin
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:57:56 -0700
Lines 37
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.8.1535393024.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CAJnmqwZ1GUZRtGRHt8xy_-tdTjVsAQKt-toGAEn5e9gjFrR0vQ@mail.gmail.com> <83513822-23BF-4695-9542-F967512A8A3D@gmail.com> <5B7CB832.4080004@tlinx.org> <20180822122211.2fgtiendc3h3p3cf@eeg.ccf.org> <20180825160259753625394@bob.proulx.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1535393025 15211 208.118.235.17 (27 Aug 2018 18:03:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
User-Agent Thunderbird
In-Reply-To <20180825160259753625394@bob.proulx.com>
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From 173.164.175.65
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14540

Show key headers only | View raw



On 8/25/2018 3:16 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>   
>> If true, that would actually violate POSIX.
>> You might be remembering it wrong.
Naw...just the marginalia that Bob mentions...
>
> I also remember that at one time the Unix sleep was implemented by
> polling a second granularity clock register.  If one was not lucky
> then polling just before the second turned, and then just after, would
> cause sleep to exit because the second had changed.  A 1 second sleep
> was 0-1 seconds. 
>
> And certainly any using the fractional second extension is past any
> need to worry about the problem.  Because any such system with the
> problem would only handle to a granularity of integer seconds anyway.
>   
---
    I'd hope such would be the case, but as soon as I'd expect such
sane behavior, I'd run into a more simplistic implementation that
met the letter if not intent of some requirement...so such things
tend to stick in my head as possible, though not very useful
implementations.

    I certainly would not take the ever-changing POSIX spec as
a guide to what actually exists or is implemented in the field.
POSIX moved away from their original mission statement of being
"descriptive" to one that is "prescriptive" a long time ago,
with "prescriptive" being based on the wants and desires of
its current membership with little or no regard for usability
or compatibility.



Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Add sleep builtin L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2018-08-27 10:57 -0700

csiph-web