Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16190

Re: [PATCH] Implement rehashing for associative arrays (Re: speeding up hash_search?)

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Koichi Murase <myoga.murase@gmail.com>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: [PATCH] Implement rehashing for associative arrays (Re: speeding up hash_search?)
Date Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:48:04 +0900
Lines 34
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.791.1587394101.3066.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CALv3B7aiTbhpyUL17Eg5prH39EgMP8uSDdD554OdND3LFETAQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLRLk8ydO6ev8wRcJ35kzzN3Yt2_9sjsc6L+C0CC6dCxud_NA@mail.gmail.com> <CALv3B7bzh3degKPCe5c_avUc90L+bE8jqKKcaVo13zwqEyB5-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLRLk-XAU3rrRHy1wWdY7Py-gkLaU-UfiPc47MOEA8eutYx1A@mail.gmail.com> <20200420124911.GW845@eeg.ccf.org> <a351bc16-182b-b2e9-319d-e9d1615f209a@case.edu> <CAFLRLk_KetD6+-o2HOdP6ueKuynu_7Yn6ARZ_HbC4QC=99-WcA@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1587394102 3828 209.51.188.17 (20 Apr 2020 14:48:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bug-bash@gnu.org, George Jones <fooologist@gmail.com>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Yr42PqqjLWtkFLwzlnqJImSmsc4+BT9rOlAjT5X+rDM=; b=t6ob3RR6rDdlActoCUCAUY0K5CxwVG+p3ai8ETx4JSMvwctyHN6Tiu3h17NbXc9fjd VTVE4GLD1/LVzH8qjy+agoG8epgF71e/Nt9W6EA9zQXWJr4YU2sWcEozfWO732/vMfsC RbkVpupfSFRvlne4cLw+/i1Nww4dx47xx+E2cyevnaXepVTVJgGayquuUBS0v63SpVQB BK1gDl8vB4hpDjwkDtJoqLThoFIiXm2RgB2G32y7otgUp9wUyZBrwEwSyhV9g/z6OEyT 42PfiuKuPFAsJoqaXr7VnLkJvDUjjK9S0SUlFWOiQEYNUDNlv5vjM5gdJv6WiNArKaOF KeoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Yr42PqqjLWtkFLwzlnqJImSmsc4+BT9rOlAjT5X+rDM=; b=SsqNIkWt2teqMky3GBfGwm40UC5wgVTedmE5xDHa0OOI9hkJcfGnxwGzSY27u/APnz WuK5+l4R09ciyYGgYWgDDURF/RNq22D1mF65FjrVsuiEXSM7KGA+IQ5dupM9EEBjmjtF LJ2np8MasCiX++F+ix9ZNFD9f70CwfTmDMfVEVIJ8eW9pZcmMp6Rr3IuHved9K7yswh/ d/2tfF4H+2yevQJLvbZ6wYMxNTOdZRpPuwuJgYuYt3wxbocADHV15+o45jRoy+DtZo79 qF5OzG51mzGQwubQZGDMIiGyP6jy9b4PO2aH27yiMM0cKIDe8YBQl4yDIQ2wRXDzVIN0 L7Zg==
X-Gm-Message-State AGi0PubXzqM/zTeY5qwir7y8J6jA5qpGKaMWvXZeB1y5Nz/Wjzcc05RA U360sb51RMouPp+RmrP4/1uz8WCkR2Oa9wYawVOTR+1++m8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source APiQypILBp+KTC8/O2+vGIhV+sp2VCnZMq3L8kWwhjyd/sQ9Foz3OBLGbNSgQVdtts8pARxcmckz0vhkvWNmK2bpWFA=
X-Received by 2002:a2e:b53b:: with SMTP id z27mr6681180ljm.114.1587394095425; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <a351bc16-182b-b2e9-319d-e9d1615f209a@case.edu>
Received-SPF pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::242; envelope-from=myoga.murase@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x242.google.com
X-detected-operating-system by eggs1p.gnu.org: Error: [-] PROGRAM ABORT : Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). Location : parse_addr6(), p0f-client.c:67
X-Received-From 2a00:1450:4864:20::242
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.23
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAFLRLk_KetD6+-o2HOdP6ueKuynu_7Yn6ARZ_HbC4QC=99-WcA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <CALv3B7aiTbhpyUL17Eg5prH39EgMP8uSDdD554OdND3LFETAQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLRLk8ydO6ev8wRcJ35kzzN3Yt2_9sjsc6L+C0CC6dCxud_NA@mail.gmail.com> <CALv3B7bzh3degKPCe5c_avUc90L+bE8jqKKcaVo13zwqEyB5-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFLRLk-XAU3rrRHy1wWdY7Py-gkLaU-UfiPc47MOEA8eutYx1A@mail.gmail.com> <20200420124911.GW845@eeg.ccf.org> <a351bc16-182b-b2e9-319d-e9d1615f209a@case.edu>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16190

Show key headers only | View raw


2020-04-20 23:05 Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>:
> On 4/20/20 8:49 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:48:44PM +0900, Koichi Murase wrote:
> >> Also, I am sorry that I disturbed your plan for contributing to Bash.
> >> I actually initially doubted that the insertion with the current
> >> implementation is O(N), so I created the test first and then found
> >> that it is an easy fix rather than reimplementing it by B-tree or
> >> other data structures.  I couldn't stop my interest in how much it is
> >> improved by the easy fix.
> >
> > This should in no way make the OP feel that they didn't contribute.
> > Spotting and diagnosing problems is important work, even if their
> > proposed patch wasn't selected as the best solution.
>
> This is quite true.

Dear All,

Yes, thank you for clarification and sorry for confusing writing.  I
did not mean George's contribution disappeared, but just I have
disturbed his five-step plan on his blog where the remaining four
steps are now canceled.  I have to add that identifying the problem is
definitely the most non-trivial part because it is relatively
straightforward to fix the problem once the problem is identified :).
Also, I would like to thank George for additional testing of my patch.

Of course, this also applies to my patches.  I think I have sent more
than ten patches so far and many of them have been applied, but I am
anyway happy if the problems are solved.  You can always reject my
patches when you have better solutions.

--
Koichi

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: [PATCH] Implement rehashing for associative arrays (Re: speeding up hash_search?) Koichi Murase <myoga.murase@gmail.com> - 2020-04-20 23:48 +0900

csiph-web