Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16174

Re: looking for consistent C-c trap behavior

From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: looking for consistent C-c trap behavior
Date 2020-04-19 15:16 -0400
Organization ITS, Case Western Reserve University
Message-ID <mailman.710.1587323784.3066.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <M58iOBd--3-2@tutanota.com> <a8b7d5fc-0a64-0a0e-bd49-7f808f937813@case.edu> <M5EEHGq--3-2@tutanota.com> <dc44f492-ce44-463a-685e-58ecddf38888@case.edu>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/18/20 5:41 PM, gentoo_eshoes@tutanota.com wrote:

> can confirm that indeed `bash --posix` does interrupt the 'read -p' on first C-c, however, the inside-trap seen exit code is 0, but if the trap doesn't `exit` itself, then the exit code after the 'read -p' is seen correctly as 130, ie.
> $ ./sigintread.bash 
> Press C-c here...^Cinterrupted sees exit code '0'
> 
> Normal exit sees ec=130
> 
> Would it be possible to somehow get 130 even inside the trap function?
> 
> this would then be equivalent with interrupting 'sleep' for example:
> $ ./sigintread.bash 
> ^Cinterrupted sees exit code '130'
> 
> Normal exit sees ec=130

This is a reasonable idea for posix mode, since the trap action is run
after the read command returns.

> On another note, I naively tried to patch out the POSIX requirement, for my own/local_use puposes but had no effect:

This (from bashline.c) is for readline support. The `read -e' comment is
true.


-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: looking for consistent C-c trap behavior Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2020-04-19 15:16 -0400

csiph-web