Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11205
| From | Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | general loadable integration |
| Date | 2015-07-14 05:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6911.1436865082.904.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <20150713204638.GA8279@sagulo> <20150714010230.GA721@ma.sdf.org> <20150714054919.GA3374@sagulo> <55A4C4B1.4040501@gmail.com> <CAPSX3sRepVTSjezsDDr1xV6qghmJaK6=Tm_tsEeiCpMYFbqmxw@mail.gmail.com> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 14 Jul 2015 11:35, Pierre Gaston wrote: > I think adoption would be difficult considering even a useful loadable > builtin like "finfo" has not found its way into default installations, but > for instance I can imagine bash programmable completion could go another > level with an embedded interpreter that lets you access the readline > internals. finfo is under the "examples" directory, and all of the loadable logic isn't exactly trivial to package. it feels kind of bolted on, especially when you try to build & install things. if we want the loadables to be more of a first class concept than something people only play around with locally on their own systems, this needs polishing. -mike
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
general loadable integration Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> - 2015-07-14 05:11 -0400
csiph-web