Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11608

Re: Want way to run background processes with SIGINT unignored

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Want way to run background processes with SIGINT unignored
Date Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:53:44 -0400
Organization ITS, Case Western Reserve University
Lines 40
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.67.1444514049.7904.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <22040.2725.561993.552660@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <561951D3.30606@case.edu> <561972C2.2030507@tlinx.org>
Reply-To chet.ramey@case.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1444514050 29853 208.118.235.17 (10 Oct 2015 21:54:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc bug-bash@gnu.org, Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>, chet.ramey@case.edu
To Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To <561972C2.2030507@tlinx.org>
X-Junkmail-Whitelist YES (by domain whitelist at mpv1.tis.cwru.edu)
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic]
X-Received-From 129.22.105.36
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.14
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11608

Show key headers only | View raw


On 10/10/15 4:19 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 10/9/15 2:42 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>> However, it would be very easy for bash to provide an option (via `set
>>> -o' perhaps) to disable this behaviour.  That is, to allow SIGINT to
>>> be delivered normally to child processes.
>>
>> I'm restricting non-standard options to `shopt' to avoid any possible
>> conflict with future posix changes.
> ---
> Thats a straw-man excuse if I ever heard one: use a "bash_"
> prefix to any new options.  But, still, if you think even that
> that might collide w/future posix choices, then don't use shopt
> at all: use "bashopt" with bash-defined options and usage.
> Either way, that should allay your worries on that front.

That's a fairly impressive misunderstanding.  I'm talking about adding
options to `shopt', which is not standardized and specific to bash,
instead of adding the `set -o' option Ian requested because I'm leaving
the `set -o' namespace to Posix.


>>> With such an option, scripts which run on modern systems and which
>>> attempt to parallelise their work, would be able to arrange that ^C
>>> properly cleans up the whole process group, rather than leaving the
>>> background tasks running (doing needless work and perhaps causing
>>> lossage).
> ----
>     I pointed this out as a serious regression in 4.3 as bash
> makes steps to really screw up async/realtime children handling
> work in:

This really doesn't have anything to do with what Ian is talking about.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Want way to run background processes with SIGINT unignored Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2015-10-10 17:53 -0400

csiph-web