Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15386

Re: Incorrect example for `[[` command.

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From hk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Incorrect example for `[[` command.
Date Sat, 21 Sep 2019 08:12:56 +0800
Lines 53
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.669.1569024793.2190.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CAD0rTC7W20s7-8np7Z+CmZQczTQ+LX=Y1x01gAenewrpiJS5jw@mail.gmail.com> <8e7c8ea4-2fdf-4809-0b50-ea1bfbbec165@case.edu> <CAD0rTC68qoXvCV9SLP1dJ8Gvg71W7bg9yt8jjpmpESK-jKD7Wg@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1569024793 15256 209.51.188.17 (21 Sep 2019 00:13:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc bug-bash@gnu.org
To chet.ramey@case.edu
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xlamOJ/Z3zLmuMFU+US+j2MGaXdvp8uGRd1yTmzqQeY=; b=XTYzbgXzaLlrNY+3Ppi8LgIKeMsRzfEmI5SiVJohEMem0tXJtMQymGB0q9f0uKYq2J JBowz01bXm0Wca0kk9kvW7yB9ZGaHu+/uCh/iHTom08SrJB0S3/q3Hcr0a57lKJ7bjae lDqhwCY1pGuvd6iFxoUpRskscG9g/biv+cSjn7OtMP1zeJnUfczJaUZ7HE1IZd9C6U/x QlDIwWl7YA6tBh4vmObGQpgWW16R7q1LU6yE/nAsdAxrx2NkW4/7K43+Wu6KiqktxZ6R DLLi/tya+8Pkwr5O+1JdHgmXDGLZwVYE+5MtUyruU37STFXDuwg+rSfX3XzYA1a4hlId 1yJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xlamOJ/Z3zLmuMFU+US+j2MGaXdvp8uGRd1yTmzqQeY=; b=ljDhJEQcDYkcRgDzduxnTwM5njfj0hiLruzlHZvENc/AHQeitTxszmzH9jWHf93Ke/ BlbeYw/tMLyfOZEQ5B5CdtUTBLZCb3vqXmAbrcq5p1IGdTKkEPGd0jy8uSAv3L5biCEh /TsNS/YXDzaJwSXCG6ucsxr/tNnuuAuhLZh3PouiQVJSo4gyBDbLCgzHWaZARgQHl4Xv JuM1pEo1WfsLTDOnfAop2XaFFcPApBZmyYlVtWcNxuAVj3OsW/tZj+DcfB+LyaQoIxnh 00gDNUq3jVlqQzbo58zwlUEcEkt0p9Bjd1LqKpmlL1c8JhI4i8PIaxkqwfCN4xgLwzMu 32YA==
X-Gm-Message-State APjAAAWWj+pj5nV25q1xXbgglI4sY0xQkvDWlEyg7fqje8GvE586aY5J t7jza/C4zRNnrv2PpVc3Y8f1J5ZWMn/rqaxHIZg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source APXvYqyr7d53X6myR8peYmcKPXsG4sYL/GRvVws6M3oXlwq2NpgXIbvfQWplbCkYukvN+NOgQSDa9o5PV23Zq5uqPrc=
X-Received by 2002:ac8:5357:: with SMTP id d23mr6297778qto.223.1569024788137; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <8e7c8ea4-2fdf-4809-0b50-ea1bfbbec165@case.edu>
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized.
X-Received-From 2607:f8b0:4864:20::831
X-Content-Filtered-By Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.23
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAD0rTC68qoXvCV9SLP1dJ8Gvg71W7bg9yt8jjpmpESK-jKD7Wg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <CAD0rTC7W20s7-8np7Z+CmZQczTQ+LX=Y1x01gAenewrpiJS5jw@mail.gmail.com> <8e7c8ea4-2fdf-4809-0b50-ea1bfbbec165@case.edu>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15386

Show key headers only | View raw


Thanks for the reply. I was wrong in my report. It does match values like
aab and  aaaaaab  in its original form.

What is wrong is the description `zero or one instances of 'a''. But if we
correct the right hand side word to be  `[[:space:]]*(a)?b' that it does
match what the description says.(the parenthese around `a' could be
omitted).

I was also wrong saying it was a pattern instead of a regular expression.
It is syntatically correct as a regular expression. A word can be
syntactically correct as a pattern and a regular expression at the same
time though the semantic might be different in most cases.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:48 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:

> On 9/20/19 1:40 AM, hk wrote:
>
> > Bash Version: 5.0
> > Patch Level: 0
> > Release Status: release
> >
> > Description:
> >         On section 3.2.4.2 of Bash Reference Manual, the example on*
> > [[...]]* (page 13 in the PDF) is incorrect. Specifically, the example
> say *[[
> > $line =~ [[:space:]]*?(a)b ]]*  will match values like *'aab'* and*
> > 'aaaaaab*'. But it won't. The operator is* =~*, but the operand on the
> > right side is a pattern while it should be a regular expression.
>
> Thanks for the report, this is a good catch. It's been this way since 2011.
>
> It's supposed to be a regular expression, and there's a typo. You're right
> that it doesn't match the same things as if it were interpreted as a shell
> pattern.
>
> The pattern would match the description if it were `[[:space:]]*(a)?b'.
>
> The pattern, once corrected, does match the strings in the example below,
> since, as the description says, it matches "a sequence of characters in the
> value."
>
> The regexp is unanchored, though you can anchor it yourself. That's
> arguably less useful than the anchored case (like, say, grep), but that's
> what you get from regcomp/regexec, and you have $BASH_REMATCH to see what
> you matched.
>
> Chet
>
> --
> ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
>                  ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
> Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
>

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Incorrect example for `[[` command. hk <hkadeveloper@gmail.com> - 2019-09-21 08:12 +0800

csiph-web