Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14972

Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?

Path csiph.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?
Date Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:11:44 +0100
Lines 20
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.6411.1545945540.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CABrM6wmrn2gi8_HgmRg67B5nsgGNFRn8Bn-r20MvC-_2LJHZ0g@mail.gmail.com> <5dac2cf2-2fac-0fd1-058f-6a84a3271738@case.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1545945541 4408 208.118.235.17 (27 Dec 2018 21:19:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
In-Reply-To <5dac2cf2-2fac-0fd1-058f-6a84a3271738@case.edu>
Content-Language en-GB
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy]
X-Received-From 37.59.109.123
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14972

Show key headers only | View raw


Op 27-12-18 om 19:22 schreef Chet Ramey:
> On 12/26/18 10:49 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
> 
>> Although [[ -z ${1+s} ]]  and (($#)) works for testing if $1 is set,
>> neither of them are uniformly better performance wise. In this case,
>> should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported?
> 
> So you're saying that neither of the existing options performs better
> than the other, though they both perform well, so we should add some
> new capability just because? That's a particularly poor argument.

Consistency might be a better argument. If [[ -v foo ]] is equivalent to 
[[ -n ${foo+s} ]] for variables (with the advantage that you don't need 
'eval' to handle arbitrary values of 'foo'), then perhaps it's not 
unreasonable to expect [[ -v 1 ]] to be equivalent to [[ -n ${1+s} ]].

FWIW, zsh and mksh do support this; ksh93 doesn't.

- M.

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Should [[ -v 1 ]] be supported? Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.org> - 2018-12-27 22:11 +0100

csiph-web