Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14942

Re: Error on arithmetic evaluation of `~0`.

From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Error on arithmetic evaluation of `~0`.
Date 2018-12-22 12:00 -0500
Organization ITS, Case Western Reserve University
Message-ID <mailman.6137.1545498030.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CAFra36gW8Csu-84oRLV7QsR7PbiMYq6g7WnMktjfnrSdTys38g@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/19/18 10:31 PM, Bize Ma wrote:
> This is the third time I am reporting this issue.

Not really, but let's go on.

> 
> This fails:
> 
> var=(hello); echo "${var[~0]}"
> syntax error: operand expected ...

Yes. The comment in the code says:

"Right now, the code
 suppresses tilde expansion when expanding in a pure arithmetic
 context, but allows it when expanding an array subscript.  This is
 for backwards compatibility, but I figure nobody's relying on it"

I suppose backwards compatibility here is less important at this point.

> 
> While this works:
> 
> var=(hello); echo "${var[ ~0]}"
> hello

Because negative array subscripts count backwards from the end of the
array.

> It is also interesting that this fails:
> 
> var=hello; echo "${var[ ~0]}"
> bash: var: bad array subscript
> 
> Isn't `var[0]` valid and equivalent to `var` ?

Yes, but ~0 (-1) is not the same as 0.

> This was "supposed" to be resolved in a dev version,
> but is still present on bash 5.

The other arithmetic contexts you reported (the "pure" arithmetic contexts
the comment above references) were changed; this was left for backwards
compatibility. Like I said above, it looks like it's time to deemphasize
that.

Chet
-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Error on arithmetic evaluation of `~0`. Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2018-12-22 12:00 -0500

csiph-web