Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16555
| From | Chris Elvidge <celvidge001@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters |
| Date | 2020-07-09 17:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5.1594313334.2306.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <b1c19d38-64c0-f1ae-d08a-1ada435a0022@gmail.com> <20200706115026.GV22833@eeg.ccf.org> <re7hp9$ids$1@ciao.gmane.io> |
On 06/07/2020 12:50 pm, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 07:00:54PM +0100, Chris Elvidge wrote: >> I've used 'return $((!$#))' and 'return $[!$#]' to return an error if no >> parameters given to function. > > The problem with this is that it *always* returns from the function, > even when paramters are given. > > If you actually want to do what you said, you need a conditional check > of some kind, either "if" or "||". > > (($#)) || return 1 > > would be my preference, if you really do not want to give any kind of > error message to indicate *why* you are returning with a failure code. > > If you want to add an error message, then I would go with "if". > > if ((! $#)); then > echo "usage: myfunc arg1 ..." >&2 > return 1 > fi > > This is a function only for me. The return comes after a help section. [[ $# -eq 0 || "$1" =~ -h ]] && etc. No error message required, just an indication. Thanks for the pointers. -- Chris Elvidge England
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Return from function depending on number of parameters Chris Elvidge <celvidge001@gmail.com> - 2020-07-09 17:48 +0100
csiph-web