Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14456

Re: Rational Range Interpretation for bash-5.0?

From Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Rational Range Interpretation for bash-5.0?
Date 2018-08-06 15:12 -0600
Message-ID <mailman.4773.1533589978.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <1f2b7e3e-3dee-f5bb-7f0b-59393ae99902@case.edu>

Show all headers | View raw


Chet Ramey wrote:
> Hi. I am considering making bash glob expansion implement rational range
> interpretation starting with bash-5.0 -- basically making globasciiranges
> the default. It looks like glibc is going to do this for version 2.28 (at
> least for a-z, A-Z, and 0-9), and other GNU utilities have done it for some
> time. What do folks think?

I think the non-rational ranges in libc were a terrible idea that we
have all been suffering with over the last decade plus.

Bob

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Rational Range Interpretation for bash-5.0? Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> - 2018-08-06 15:12 -0600

csiph-web