Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14855
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.org> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Optimisation request |
| Date | Mon, 26 Nov 2018 22:29:39 +0100 |
| Lines | 15 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4687.1543267788.1284.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1543267789 15069 208.118.235.17 (26 Nov 2018 21:29:49 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
| Content-Language | en-GB |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] |
| X-Received-From | 37.59.109.123 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.21 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14855 |
Show key headers only | View raw
I've noticed bash-5.0beta is quite a bit faster than bash-4.4 in running a lot of pure shell code. Good news. One optimisation that isn't done yet: if a subshell function like f() (foo) is used in a command substitution, it forks twice. I would like it if it could be optimised to eliminate the fork if the subshell function is the last command in the command substitution. Thanks, - M.
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Optimisation request Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.org> - 2018-11-26 22:29 +0100
csiph-web