Re: Feature discussion - startup files

From	Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: Feature discussion - startup files
Date	2015-12-23 08:53 -0500
Message-ID	<mailman.444.1450878806.843.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<56785EE2.3050108@case.edu> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1512212150530.26539@bugs.loonybin.net> <CAG3L380yU=GRX4aHR42MnPYE1PteJP=_aPos6JrYyWgok2wn5Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1512230140020.10035@bugs.loonybin.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/23/15 2:49 AM, Rob Foehl wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Fotis Georgatos wrote:
> 
>> Compare bash vs zsh:
>> http://blog.flowblok.id.au/static/images/shell-startup-actual.png 

Please stop referring to this diagram; it is misleading in that it
assumes that a large number of things that are off by default have
been enabled.  It may reflect the state of affairs on his particular
Linux distribution, but it doesn't reflect what most people see.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Feature discussion - startup files Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2015-12-23 08:53 -0500

csiph-web