Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15704

Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion

Path csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion
Date Fri, 6 Dec 2019 22:29:14 +0200
Lines 46
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.433.1575664257.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <20191205201157.cd481936f76d95bbdfabc73c@schrader-schulte.de> <662e2328-f331-c554-afcf-fd3819f6beab@case.edu> <20191206055304.076d6115afa3a4f2a6a21c34@schrader-schulte.de> <5b5064a8-7175-42e7-1eb5-6374dee6c11e@redhat.com> <21761e28-c496-ff67-d7b7-628c9325085f@iki.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1575664258 30873 209.51.188.17 (6 Dec 2019 20:30:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc chet.ramey@case.edu
To Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Martin Schulte <gnu@schrader-schulte.de>, bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
In-Reply-To <5b5064a8-7175-42e7-1eb5-6374dee6c11e@redhat.com>
Content-Language en-US
X-SASI-RCODE 200
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iki.fi; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtp; bh=D2MWWG7v3HaEIye/OCCWbXm0QoxxnAZzvH1t/tI6ie4=; b=AU70zhUmrDPVnQofQVNKh/lIHGj/GY1sJipMj35erTiySp8soGjzXsAgtuOuMF3TenU71SrG+JmhYXOVGtDddkep7Yhwzgh1ynCYLOky598btDyxGKFPp/70rppPSMy2Lzyl0yIkwA2nDqMWVhjkSCvs3Y6CSE2bSeMPxFYg5XbsywiCJ+AGB3x7pJ5rcOScCUR9I6aBiYXC6U42CPrEH1xtgfgsc+bfQx9qpjhyYhOeJFs1ZBZj/XZ3hEQjYfBSjbhiQ+binAmoxxaGRkiwXkpZEmMraXGxvg0MWAusR2LX6tbngTsQTWO8YFPzj3LHJHwlnGPm7/cwVlBlfRtFFw==
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 8.x [fuzzy]
X-Received-From 157.24.2.213
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.23
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <21761e28-c496-ff67-d7b7-628c9325085f@iki.fi>
X-Mailman-Original-References <20191205201157.cd481936f76d95bbdfabc73c@schrader-schulte.de> <662e2328-f331-c554-afcf-fd3819f6beab@case.edu> <20191206055304.076d6115afa3a4f2a6a21c34@schrader-schulte.de> <5b5064a8-7175-42e7-1eb5-6374dee6c11e@redhat.com>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15704

Show key headers only | View raw


On 6.12. 21:36, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/5/19 10:53 PM, Martin Schulte wrote:
> 
>>>> (2019-11-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux $ echo ${BASH_VERSINFO[@]}
>>>> 4 4 12 1 release x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>>>> $ set -x
>>>> $ echo {Z..a}
>>>> + echo Z '[' '' ']' '^' _ '`' a
>>>> Z [  ] ^ _ ` a
>>>>
>>>> It looks as if the backslash (between [ and ] in ASCII code) is
>>>> missing in brace expansion. The same behaviour seems to be found in
>>>> bash 5.0.
>>>
>>> It's an unquoted backslash, which is removed by quote removal when the
>>> words are expanded. Look at the extra space between `[' and `]'; that's
>>> the null argument resulting from the unquoted backslash.
>>
>> Yes - sure. But then I'm wondering why the unquoted backtick doesn't
>> start command substitution:
> 
> It may be version dependent:
> 
> $ echo ${BASH_VERSINFO[@]}
> 5 0 7 1 release x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
> 
> $ echo b{Z..a}d
> bash: bad substitution: no closing "`" in `d

I get that with 4.4 and 'echo b{Z..a}d' too, the trailing letter seems 
to trigger it.

Which also doesn't seem to make sense, but one might argue that {Z..a} 
doesn't make much sense in the first place. Seriously, is there an 
actual use case for such a range?

It doesn't seem to even generalize from that if you go beyond letters, 
so you can't do stuff like generating all the printable ASCII characters 
with it in Bash.


-- 
Ilkka Virta / itvirta@iki.fi

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Backslash missing in brace expansion Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi> - 2019-12-06 22:29 +0200

csiph-web