Re: First lines of examples/startup-files/bashrc

From	Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Newsgroups	gnu.bash.bug
Subject	Re: First lines of examples/startup-files/bashrc
Date	2020-04-09 09:52 -0400
Message-ID	<mailman.409.1586440381.2644.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References	<20200408234241.84fa2643163cc7ec3aedc6ef@schrader-schulte.de> <CAOSMAuvsyHZ18kM6RaDfoCVynprvTkEbgtHsi9EX1JXcxs9rPg@mail.gmail.com> <5a9bfbee-e20b-1e98-bc36-d04372c5bb5a@case.edu> <20200409135256.GB845@eeg.ccf.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 09:48:37AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 4/8/20 7:46 PM, Eduardo Bustamante wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:42 PM Martin Schulte <gnu@schrader-schulte.de> wrote:
> > (...)
> >> But, as far as I understand, a non-interactive bash doesn't read
> >> ~/.bashrc at all - so shouldn't we just omit them?
> > 
> > There are exceptions. One of them being SSH, see:
> > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/tree/shell.c?h=ea31c00845c858098d232bd014bf27b5a63a668b#n1095
> 
> My guess is that Debian has compiled bash with SSH_SOURCE_BASHRC defined.

That's correct.  See
https://sources.debian.org/src/bash/5.0-4/debian/patches/deb-bash-config.diff/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: First lines of examples/startup-files/bashrc Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-04-09 09:52 -0400

csiph-web