Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15698

Re: man bash does not list 'in' as a builtin command

Path csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Peter Benjamin <pete@peterbenjamin.com>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: man bash does not list 'in' as a builtin command
Date Thu, 05 Dec 2019 23:51:23 -0800
Lines 30
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.390.1575644273.1979.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <14db6b9f69f249db60a0f92df80339d88efba152.camel@peterbenjamin.com> <4dc457e0135603025cd500acdc95db53f9d30482.camel@peterbenjamin.com> <6F7CBE03-C2F4-45CC-91D6-8A72A0C7B3B6@gmail.com> <2919.1574767603@jinx.noi.kre.to> <febce9953533d8449c409a266b81091957f1cdee.camel@peterbenjamin.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1575644274 20769 209.51.188.17 (6 Dec 2019 14:57:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc "bash.bug list" <bug-bash@gnu.org>
To Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
In-Reply-To <2919.1574767603@jinx.noi.kre.to>
X-Mailer Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From 173.230.157.158
X-Content-Filtered-By Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.23
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <febce9953533d8449c409a266b81091957f1cdee.camel@peterbenjamin.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <14db6b9f69f249db60a0f92df80339d88efba152.camel@peterbenjamin.com> <4dc457e0135603025cd500acdc95db53f9d30482.camel@peterbenjamin.com> <6F7CBE03-C2F4-45CC-91D6-8A72A0C7B3B6@gmail.com> <2919.1574767603@jinx.noi.kre.to>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15698

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 18:26 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> With that in mind the message in question isn't really confusing at all.

I agree.  With one little exception.

Bash has two levels of error checking, that can generate the message.

1) Command line parsing and interpreting.

2) Bash script parsing and interpreting.

I looked first into the latter, my new code is always thought to have the error, before I suspect open
source software quality.  Then, I started suspecting the former, the CLI, then confirmed it.

And it could only happen for the one word, 'in', and no other.  A very special case indeed.  No worthy
of time to edit and debug and QA software.

@Robert: Down Under is a very fine place to live, indeed.

@Chris: I like the 'type' command.  Thanks.

BTW, I have named thousands of custom scripts, one letter, 2, 3, or 2 to 8 words, etc.  Never had a
problem with figuring out an error message, until this one.

'in' was the initials of the longer two words I wished to name it, but for keystroke counting purposes I
wanted just two letters.  I was going to use the command frequently for some days, 20-50 times a day.  A
testing script.  I settled on 'inn' being next fastest to type.

Peter

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: man bash does not list 'in' as a builtin command Peter Benjamin <pete@peterbenjamin.com> - 2019-12-05 23:51 -0800

csiph-web