Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16652
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Oğuz <oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Should $(fg) resume a stopped job? |
| Date | Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:03:56 +0300 |
| Lines | 17 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.362.1596175480.2739.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAH7i3Lr72e4Bn3q-Ywn6vnyvT9gx4wTCe6Q9tLAVHV-L7ufhrw@mail.gmail.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1596175481 19854 209.51.188.17 (31 Jul 2020 06:04:41 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=L9TP/8H0Ou+HT+gUa3iJ/XE4qrVFMMnD8Az0a1y96tg=; b=eqmmS/EGBneUJASNKM85sd60hTxPj6Lv2vnhSQWtpMgrnU0JXF/zhh847t5ismCaIA Ih4F3ishZ67mPfGd7LbroeDNUUlBM419LJsjW4AN7bCD73VqX/+/PZiTTAsLi6IZ8TW2 Ir4X622Q6exeZugj0rgEolOObAJuYCPSN1If71uG1YnmW9SQ+i6TSmmUrTB6b0Xavr7H zp9Zb1wNwHoeMq/EfH9Wi8uhXK5OMOuLBStoQDUETEaU8HCDXoQ9YTQH3zlciT2x8/yh 5BkljPZscXIxkKwVCLeLjz3b9OwomseW74Wrpn3/x9vdjVqId5KsH2k3bo56RUoaXxyR ttiQ== |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=L9TP/8H0Ou+HT+gUa3iJ/XE4qrVFMMnD8Az0a1y96tg=; b=SUVhUlxENSZcQJC4gtrisAuRwBhL8JVSlAi4s3kUzdtx+naMdDU5j4qeo7yZbjmKet XPowBvsVj/aFIFndiYyZScqzWk/cFFaC/3MO45Lv9j3gWTKBJxBJSuAzQipPMwnkHC+/ 39CBetwhmW9Me+05BbhbF+N7fweni2FGpax3Yq8Ifvo+GdsULCwy9uLdhOOY/daaj3cj 9U+LqwU9ONgNO5BUd4bqkDpAVoRPZssZCZNThzjFI9MprJ+XtsuvDDBGWBX5SYzo8VTG KCDNighmO/fzokYGJlf7Mmw/M+T0mJtQ3xKtLaG2lYakE64UCaM5sZWkRdNqZ7OIRLJl u6Gg== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AOAM531wR768i46KZyHE7QH7/WYqh3n4HlgAAjL1riIyJhmYdlR/Kb1s 2l6QUKgzfnHO/1SsWvjSyt8zsF4daqd8ZDwTs4SoR023bZA= |
| X-Google-Smtp-Source | ABdhPJygJM1oET0UR7geFv3OUUTxwnym4IQfV6Ey6lVHxvahNajKqTJt8dmhAeKusLpyt/3hnsnVUONzEGLMgRdM80s= |
| X-Received | by 2002:ae9:ea13:: with SMTP id f19mr2504257qkg.331.1596175473518; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:04:33 -0700 (PDT) |
| Received-SPF | pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::733; envelope-from=oguzismailuysal@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x733.google.com |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. |
| X-Spam_score_int | -20 |
| X-Spam_score | -2.1 |
| X-Spam_bar | -- |
| X-Spam_report | (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Spam_action | no action |
| X-Content-Filtered-By | Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <CAH7i3Lr72e4Bn3q-Ywn6vnyvT9gx4wTCe6Q9tLAVHV-L7ufhrw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16652 |
Show key headers only | View raw
$ sleep 25
^Z
[1]+ Stopped sleep 25
$
$ echo $(fg; jobs %)
bash: jobs: %: no such job
sleep 25
$
$ jobs
[1]+ Running sleep 25 &
What I gather from this is that bash fakes interactive job control in
command substitution context, because otherwise `fg' wouldn't return
immediately. But I don't see any point in that `fg' resumes the stopped job
when it's faked. Is this a bug or a deliberate choice?
Oğuz
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Should $(fg) resume a stopped job? Oğuz <oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> - 2020-07-31 09:03 +0300
csiph-web