Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11404

Re: -e does not take effects in subshell

Path csiph.com!au2pb.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!news.ripco.com!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: -e does not take effects in subshell
Date Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:56:47 -0400
Organization ITS, Case Western Reserve University
Lines 28
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.26.1440115119.31004.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <BLU176-W28809FB59FF9274B34D871D67F0@phx.gbl> <20150811135056.GD4309@eeg.ccf.org> <BLU176-W27103575D91F4EF315336FD67D0@phx.gbl> <55CC26A7.10000@redhat.com> <55D39A71.2030109@tlinx.org> <87mvxo5mme.fsf@igel.home> <55D3B22E.9040507@tlinx.org> <20150819124214.GL4309@eeg.ccf.org> <55D4FBEA.10602@tlinx.org>
Reply-To chet.ramey@case.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1440115119 27532 208.118.235.17 (20 Aug 2015 23:58:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc "bug-bash@gnu.org" <bug-bash@gnu.org>, chet.ramey@case.edu
To Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>, Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
In-Reply-To <55D4FBEA.10602@tlinx.org>
X-Junkmail-Whitelist YES (by domain whitelist at mpv2.tis.cwru.edu)
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic]
X-Received-From 129.22.105.37
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.14
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11404

Show key headers only | View raw


On 8/19/15 5:58 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> 
> 
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>
>> (Wow, how did we get here from "-e does not take effects in subshell"?)
>>
> ---
> because the POSIX spec changed and bash's handling of "-e"
> changed to follow the new spec.

This is true, though I would have used `revised' instead of `new'.

> The earlier spec had -e only exit a script if a *simple* (external)
> command failed.  It didn't include builtins nor functions.

This is not; builtins and functions are simple commands.

The Posix spec changed because it didn't accurately reflect historical
behavior.  There was a *lot* of discussion about how to accurately
describe the desired behavior, but everyone agreed that restricting it
to simple commands was not how the `base implementations' behaved.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: -e does not take effects in subshell Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2015-08-20 19:56 -0400

csiph-web