Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11403

Re: -e does not take effects in subshell

Path csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: -e does not take effects in subshell
Date Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:42:14 -0400
Lines 25
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.25.1440113732.31004.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <BLU176-W28809FB59FF9274B34D871D67F0@phx.gbl> <20150811135056.GD4309@eeg.ccf.org> <BLU176-W27103575D91F4EF315336FD67D0@phx.gbl> <55CC26A7.10000@redhat.com> <55D39A71.2030109@tlinx.org> <87mvxo5mme.fsf@igel.home> <55D3B22E.9040507@tlinx.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1440113733 26722 208.118.235.17 (20 Aug 2015 23:35:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc "bug-bash@gnu.org" <bug-bash@gnu.org>
To Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
Content-Disposition inline
In-Reply-To <55D3B22E.9040507@tlinx.org>
User-Agent Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From 139.137.100.1
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.14
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11403

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:31:10PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> with 'rm' functionality to remove '/' '.' and '..' was prohibited
> by POSIX, though the coreutils version still allows the choice 
> of the more dangerous removal of '/' with with the --[no-]preserve-root.
> 
> But the more useful "rm -fr ." [...]

OK.  I think you are saying that the POSIX specification sentence

  If either of the files dot or dot-dot are specified as the basename portion
  of an operand (that is, the final pathname component) or if an operand
  resolves to the root directory, rm shall write a diagnostic message to
  standard error and do nothing more with such operands.

conflicts with your prior use of the GNU rm --one-file-system extension
as a shorthand for "find . -xdev -delete".

Since GNU already has a --no-preserve-root extension, as you pointed out,
I don't see what would stop them from adding another extension to permit
GNUrm -rfx . to work.  Perhaps you should come up with an appropriate
syntax for it and submit a patch to the GNU coreutils maintainers.  This
is not related to bash.

(Wow, how did we get here from "-e does not take effects in subshell"?)

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: -e does not take effects in subshell Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2015-08-19 08:42 -0400

csiph-web