Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14266
| From | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: announcing bashj |
| Date | 2018-06-23 12:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2470.1529783061.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <e74b6b2f-6902-ad32-b52c-6c8f99ed4514@gmail.com> <CAOSMAus3T58At9CS_jC7p+BBfbe51sJkP_JD9hbsFHZNt1bgHQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Seems like the original missed being sent toe the bug-bash alias. But I'm curious... What's the context for this? FWIW, removing non-bug-bash-subscribers (that I know of), as my question is aimed, I guess, at Eduardo, but not sure if it was posted to bash list or not? Maybe I just missed it? Thanks! -linda Eduardo Bustamante wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:08 PM, pg <philippe.gonze@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > >> Description: BASHJ - ANNOUNCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM OF BASH >> >> I am pleased to inform you about bashj - a bash 'mutant' with java >> support. >> This product opens numerous very interesting fields to bash developers. >> > > I have a few questions / comments: > > * Under which license / use terms are you releasing bashj? It doesn't > seem to be free software, the source code does not seem to be > available in the Sourceforge project, and I can't find any reference > to the license in the links you shared. FWIW, I don't have > enough confidence to test bashj by just downloading a random JAR file > from the internet and executing it in my computer. I would like to be > able to inspect the source code and build it myself. > > * The wiki page recommends creating the installation directory with > 0777 permissions. That seems a bit too insecure? Why does it need > world-wide write permissions? (i.e. "sudo mkdir -m=777 /var/lib/bashj/ > # create the installation directory") > > * What's the motivation behind bashj? I'm having trouble > understanding why one would like to use a mixture of Java and bash in > the same program, when there are options like Jython and Groovy to run > dynamic scripting languages in the JVM. Are you using bashj for a > particular application for which Groovy wasn't apt? > > * Since I haven't run the code (for reasons explained above): How do > you handle things like the program's current working directory, the > environment, subshells, controlling terminal, etc. when everything > seems to run in the same JVM server process? > >
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: announcing bashj L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2018-06-23 12:44 -0700
csiph-web