Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16595
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: 'foo > >(bar)' doesn't set $! for external foo not invoked via 'command' |
| Date | 2020-07-20 10:14 -0400 |
| Organization | ITS, Case Western Reserve University |
| Message-ID | <mailman.230.1595254488.24492.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <20200719204836.GA1184@mutt> <CAH7i3Lqre0SoX_nJaMis=g7T_+X1LtrsPWJiJCjRCrHT1Y4_Jw@mail.gmail.com> <1659625e-267d-402e-c199-0772820fed79@case.edu> <20200720141119.GA2767@mutt> <6cfd9bdd-a282-0761-1354-1fc5f60703f3@case.edu> |
On 7/20/20 10:11 AM, Rusty Bird wrote: > Chet Ramey: >>>> Description: >>>> $! isn't set to the PID of 'bar' for >>>> >>>> foo > >(bar) >>>> >>>> if 'foo' is an external program (as opposed to a builtin or >>>> function) - unless it's invoked via 'command'. >> >> Redirections are performed in the subshell created to execute `foo', so the >> process substitution is invoked there and can't affect the parent's $!. > > I guess my question is: Would it not make sense to always perform the > redirection before the subshell is created? You could make a case for it, but I'm not inclined to invalidate 30+ years of bash backward compatibility unless the reason is a lot more compelling. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: 'foo > >(bar)' doesn't set $! for external foo not invoked via 'command' Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2020-07-20 10:14 -0400
csiph-web