Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16002

Re: performance bug of [[ $x ]]

From Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@gmail.com>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: performance bug of [[ $x ]]
Date 2020-03-07 22:31 -0600
Message-ID <mailman.2279.1583641886.2412.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CABrM6w=ignEwgynRTYYbBLUNs=KVhE8WCf9h=kkgHj00QNoqmw@mail.gmail.com> <20200307225816.GA997327@chrisdown.name> <CABrM6w=f1bqMekCcfSdzYGrMVFTzpWFniFKhspfBqdfyDxn1hQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200308021011.GA1065042@chrisdown.name> <CABrM6wk5n4Qjk_P+7T63GoHhkGSJJZkfJDV3mBxCHJCeoryXcA@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


My OS is Mac OS X. I don't have perf. Is it only on linux? Could you
show me the output of your perf?

On 3/7/20, Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> wrote:
> Peng Yu writes:
>>Could you show me how you do the profiling for this specific case?
>>Based on what proof that you can conclude that it is not the `[[`
>>performance problem?
>
> Like I said, `perf` is perfectly adequate.
>
>      bash -c 'x=$(printf "%.sx" {1..10000000}); perf record -g -p $$ & sleep
> 2; time [[ $x ]]'
>
> You might as well just use `:`.
>


-- 
Regards,
Peng

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: performance bug of [[ $x ]] Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@gmail.com> - 2020-03-07 22:31 -0600

csiph-web