Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15248

Re: expression evaluation problem

Path csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: expression evaluation problem
Date Fri, 26 Jul 2019 03:04:12 -0700
Lines 42
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.2273.1564135482.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <5D3889D2.3090101@tlinx.org> <20190724175103.GN1218@eeg.ccf.org> <5D38A6BF.9020309@tlinx.org> <66182cdf-4448-8b49-fa65-d28ef1c64b95@iki.fi> <5D3AD01C.6010203@tlinx.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1564135482 15395 209.51.188.17 (26 Jul 2019 10:04:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org>
To Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
User-Agent Thunderbird
In-Reply-To <66182cdf-4448-8b49-fa65-d28ef1c64b95@iki.fi>
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic]
X-Received-From 173.164.175.65
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.23
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <5D3AD01C.6010203@tlinx.org>
X-Mailman-Original-References <5D3889D2.3090101@tlinx.org> <20190724175103.GN1218@eeg.ccf.org> <5D38A6BF.9020309@tlinx.org> <66182cdf-4448-8b49-fa65-d28ef1c64b95@iki.fi>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15248

Show key headers only | View raw



On 2019/07/25 11:15, Ilkka Virta wrote:
> On 24.7. 21:43, L A Walsh wrote:
>   
>>      The important part for me is whether or not it is faster to perform
>> 1 calculation, or 100.  So which would be faster?  In this case
>> execution speed
>> is more important than clarity.  I consider that a 'constraint'.
>>     
>
> Shouldn't it be easy enough to measure how much restructuring that 
> expression affects the execution speed?
>   
---
    Which I did and found a 25% difference using the test case I used.  It
would likely be less in shorter strings, more in longer ones.
> Also, regarding execution speed, I've been led to believe that the shell 
> in general is rather slow, and almost any other language would be better 
> if that is of concern. (awk, Perl, what have you.)
>   
----
    True, assembly would probably be the best choice if that was a sole
concern,
but sometimes I want to have an example of how to do something using only 1
language.  Similarly, many perl modules have versions that require a
compiler to
install, but some that are perl-only can work with perls going back to
5.6 or up
to 5.30 with no recompilation step.  So sometimes there's a desire for
an efficient implementation, while staying within the same language.

    Similarly, by not using some newer bash features, one can have
scripts that
are portable to a wider range of bash versions.




>
>   

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: expression evaluation problem L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2019-07-26 03:04 -0700

csiph-web