Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15248
| Path | csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: expression evaluation problem |
| Date | Fri, 26 Jul 2019 03:04:12 -0700 |
| Lines | 42 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2273.1564135482.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5D3889D2.3090101@tlinx.org> <20190724175103.GN1218@eeg.ccf.org> <5D38A6BF.9020309@tlinx.org> <66182cdf-4448-8b49-fa65-d28ef1c64b95@iki.fi> <5D3AD01C.6010203@tlinx.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1564135482 15395 209.51.188.17 (26 Jul 2019 10:04:42 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| Cc | bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| To | Ilkka Virta <itvirta@iki.fi> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| User-Agent | Thunderbird |
| In-Reply-To | <66182cdf-4448-8b49-fa65-d28ef1c64b95@iki.fi> |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] |
| X-Received-From | 173.164.175.65 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <5D3AD01C.6010203@tlinx.org> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <5D3889D2.3090101@tlinx.org> <20190724175103.GN1218@eeg.ccf.org> <5D38A6BF.9020309@tlinx.org> <66182cdf-4448-8b49-fa65-d28ef1c64b95@iki.fi> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15248 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2019/07/25 11:15, Ilkka Virta wrote:
> On 24.7. 21:43, L A Walsh wrote:
>
>> The important part for me is whether or not it is faster to perform
>> 1 calculation, or 100. So which would be faster? In this case
>> execution speed
>> is more important than clarity. I consider that a 'constraint'.
>>
>
> Shouldn't it be easy enough to measure how much restructuring that
> expression affects the execution speed?
>
---
Which I did and found a 25% difference using the test case I used. It
would likely be less in shorter strings, more in longer ones.
> Also, regarding execution speed, I've been led to believe that the shell
> in general is rather slow, and almost any other language would be better
> if that is of concern. (awk, Perl, what have you.)
>
----
True, assembly would probably be the best choice if that was a sole
concern,
but sometimes I want to have an example of how to do something using only 1
language. Similarly, many perl modules have versions that require a
compiler to
install, but some that are perl-only can work with perls going back to
5.6 or up
to 5.30 with no recompilation step. So sometimes there's a desire for
an efficient implementation, while staying within the same language.
Similarly, by not using some newer bash features, one can have
scripts that
are portable to a wider range of bash versions.
>
>
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: expression evaluation problem L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2019-07-26 03:04 -0700
csiph-web