Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15231
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | expression evaluation problem |
| Date | Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:39:46 -0700 |
| Lines | 33 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2152.1563986395.2688.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5D3889D2.3090101@tlinx.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1563986396 4475 209.51.188.17 (24 Jul 2019 16:39:56 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| User-Agent | Thunderbird |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] |
| X-Received-From | 173.164.175.65 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <5D3889D2.3090101@tlinx.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15231 |
Show key headers only | View raw
shopt -o expand_aliases
my=declare int='my -i'
my str='cf80'
int v=960 uxtra=1 c=0
# In evaluating this expression:
((v = v | ( uxtra>=++c ? ((0x${str:2*c:2}) & 63) << (6*(uxtra-c)) : 0 )))
I get 985 and not 960 as expected
Which only happens when 'c' is 0 in the middle 'str' expression,
but the ++c should increment 'c' to '1' before it is tested to be
less than or equal to 'uxtra'(=1). Then it would take the 1st or
2nd sub expression depending on that. But the test has to happen
1st, which would pre-increment 'c' to 1. If 'c' is 1, then it should
return '80' from 'str' combine with 0x to make 0x80 or 128. That,
anded with '63' should be 0, shouldn't it?
So why isn't it evaluating to '0', 'or'ed with 960, and giving 960?
Indeed, if I manually put a '1' in place of that 'c' in the middle
of the expression, I get the expected answer of 960. So it seems
'c' is evaluating as '0', even though the middle sub-expression
can't be taken/evaluated until 'c' has been incremented to 1.
BASH=4.4.12
Thanks
-linda
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
expression evaluation problem L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2019-07-24 09:39 -0700
csiph-web