Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14233

Re: [PATCH] Add nofirstword completion option

Path csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add nofirstword completion option
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2018 18:28:54 +0100
Lines 77
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.1760.1528824548.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <20180518110611.5099-1-bluca@debian.org> <96bcb197-40d1-aac8-c214-c513a6db805d@case.edu> <1527068652.6997.5.camel@debian.org> <76b1d3fa-4cb1-3e70-d93c-ada07c04dfa2@case.edu> <1527082457.6997.14.camel@debian.org> <4ccfc554-15a9-2ec1-55e1-b2df687f0bee@case.edu> <1527270167.6997.22.camel@debian.org> <3a98f6c5-0f1e-54aa-491c-da7100430ce8@case.edu> <1527605096.6997.27.camel@debian.org> <1527860403.6997.72.camel@debian.org> <1528468856.6554.6.camel@debian.org> <e33be886-7975-2e2f-d2d9-a45e24408f72@case.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XDgExfQTbFrdqIpejZOA"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1528824548 16205 208.118.235.17 (12 Jun 2018 17:29:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To chet.ramey@case.edu, bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=oos2+R3J7b78Pc1clJHKuOlRQ9H1Uh+962UowHVdfYA=; b=QUwiM2OEeixy/U5AEiUDpwxe2z2LsqxHCF+X9+1O688G343/Ns9lQns5IUf7tzrENT 3v+jCsTU+y5FAmiWjRHqKiWCmwVsuwcNxyKhoImjp+74orJhXRFp/U1GC7SMKVaVCJim 8cb4J4cMnmQmUXlHSk3wYBAsVeKWfA/Nz/XHUYbbIMtpVQTN0pjCu/FVgVGNweI4Vf+o LLVRCMDh4KlIzxs4QMZhpQ+pD3Xh22CBwMMusC6C4W4+L14f4Rolp6/OAgeCF5lJw4jK JzEd+awEJfA4+JuKNGYTY1MieumGOk99Y+WwWabE/GUMhKC2zHKqSIx5jKM0cAV5kU8B MBoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State APt69E18GeqlKqk7Vbepso6OsfoGrydthIvZZvb7E0/zYV5xHGdRJLkU EHhBRagoe7D8S1351IZVekugdVgJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source ADUXVKIy26Jgx/gp2IinhycnsAJcn2Yoa1hIb8U8iTnaSda+eIwjEUUrH2exsg0xSLMfQPygwMYLQA==
X-Received by 2002:adf:f98a:: with SMTP id f10-v6mr1060280wrr.105.1528824539271; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <e33be886-7975-2e2f-d2d9-a45e24408f72@case.edu>
X-Mailer Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From 209.85.128.194
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14233

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 11:03 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 6/8/18 10:40 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> 
> > Any chance you had a sec to look at the diff? Would love some
> > feedback!
> 
> I'm going to try and look at it this weekend. It's been a busy couple
> of
> months.

Hi Chet,

I've seen that the change is now in the devel branch, thank you so
much!
I also like way more the new option name, definitely clearer :-)

One difference I noticed with the previous version is that when trying
to complete a command when the line starts with an empty space (eg: to
avoid the history) the initial word programmable completion doesn't
happen.

It seems to hit the following branch:

       else if (s >= e && n[0] == '\0' && text[0] == '\0' && start > 0)
         {
           foundcs = 0; /* empty command name following assignments */
           in_command_position = was_assignment;
         }

Given was_assignment is 0, then the programmable completion is later
not attempted.

Since that branch matches an empty command name, should it perhaps call
the EMPTYCMD completion?
Something like:

       else if (s >= e && n[0] == '\0' && text[0] == '\0' && start > 0)
         {
           foundcs = 0; /* empty command name following assignments */
           in_command_position = was_assignment;
+          if (have_progcomps)
+            prog_complete_matches = programmable_completions (EMPTYCMD, text, s, e, &foundcs);
         }

Or is there a better solution?

Thanks!

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] Add nofirstword completion option Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2018-06-12 18:28 +0100

csiph-web