Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16037
| Path | csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? |
| Date | Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:41:59 -0700 |
| Lines | 31 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.175.1584664932.3020.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAAJSdjidSYg1yoWC7UbbLUUDF3ug9ekDtkOP7Er-JOjrLoDssQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAB+qc9AAPQbzp92tv-FOR4Kh+2UdZyRwGiPOfNegVqv5UFnU5Q@mail.gmail.com> <f1d0d39d-b6e6-c33e-7463-226f6994b99e@archlinux.org> <4305.1584111179@jinx.noi.kre.to> <5E741157.50904@tlinx.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1584664932 4234 209.51.188.17 (20 Mar 2020 00:42:12 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| Cc | John McKown <john.archie.mckown@gmail.com>, bug-bash@gnu.org |
| To | Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| User-Agent | Thunderbird |
| In-Reply-To | <4305.1584111179@jinx.noi.kre.to> |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] [fuzzy] |
| X-Received-From | 173.164.175.65 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <5E741157.50904@tlinx.org> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <CAAJSdjidSYg1yoWC7UbbLUUDF3ug9ekDtkOP7Er-JOjrLoDssQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAB+qc9AAPQbzp92tv-FOR4Kh+2UdZyRwGiPOfNegVqv5UFnU5Q@mail.gmail.com> <f1d0d39d-b6e6-c33e-7463-226f6994b99e@archlinux.org> <4305.1584111179@jinx.noi.kre.to> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16037 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2020/03/13 07:52, Robert Elz wrote: > That's OK, and at times I have been tempted that way, but it really is > easier to just do > > if <some relational test> > then > true_command1 > true_command2 > else > false_command1 > false_command2 > false_command3 > fi > ---- If you need an else clause, then using 'if' makes sense, but for a simple 1-liner equivalent to C's if (bool) truecase; bash's $bool && truecase is certainly shorter than any if;then;fi case and for a simple 1-liner, just as clear if not more so. Being concise was certainly not a design priority as much for shell as for C.
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Are there any plans for more readable, modern syntaxes for If statements? L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> - 2020-03-19 17:41 -0700
csiph-web