Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16745
| Path | csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Dashes in function names: Undocumented? |
| Date | Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:05:40 -0400 |
| Lines | 110 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1737.1597244760.2739.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAL20dLDNniiOycTe-j6t0ynS+9FG32UgDGJbn+iDEMG7Ls_==Q@mail.gmail.com> <f53f8a84-ac66-6d61-7066-01c14e8f2ce4@archlinux.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NgA9oXRF0usctKK0zI3gjmEQNcEGGqLmX" |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1597244760 5311 209.51.188.17 (12 Aug 2020 15:06:00 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Spam-BL-Results | |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=archlinux.org; s=orion; t=1597244744; bh=oV6tQKdz5aMBbE7+2Va5PLQ2a5sMaqEpd5DOLhmOhgw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=SeOOokn66Gornk+uMHuX61JjW9Z8g1gpRYJ8VBBVzA6ZZ9EQ8I6bdOOPF8b/88kMO Rn4CfoiB9vyIBPfV/c4yeZmuNl+kAWIuJCyY0gDz+OW8lJ14apwqwOy+TkyEkQxBvD gYq9mFglAHgKy7VyBpy37402VCtnD6VF4cL6QUcjhcgbolRXLYvB3vEH5aI2RYYw1i X/4LZRU0V9Qx/xwWJnK95T0uWj94C3KwdKdrBTwqz44IHtdSeewpHKILa6TwAXO+/3 7yYzxu0eGT3/OEkzMn38tFjnkVYqgShNOPHQAoz8NwdIdqTOpY6KSci4rCoP/jNcF1 SuuH+4fEvevnBIBXFHofXA1ap43tohtl0DolRIt20z6qxxth6XO+CsY77Noa+zGGaI kZEF4vWPhwVBzuBfvgC3iIWUYL6RpE0M3WrqeXC8+jEUaFIGKYyJtRfcDIZLYUVLcN sY/7MJNztRmJT+x3y9/Bgmp9QcHBsP69NxEYb4HiQWm4LV12tMQ9dGozIHieXJ3+8c qXOAaUHNyT/EK7w+UunJhWzcC1CI4lrgLPJYat7pdZOPGnz2syEEzdYrnuCowzQNDh XoR9DnXpC9Q6y2FqHVrk4n64stzIcUDQVRIMo8rMYwbgeqHPt5L9UXgN9lKrDLaz0F /e1KUmfeKoQG1QUD1lzCkZ7Q= |
| X-Clacks-Overhead | GNU Terry Pratchett |
| In-Reply-To | <CAL20dLDNniiOycTe-j6t0ynS+9FG32UgDGJbn+iDEMG7Ls_==Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| Received-SPF | pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:160:6087::1; envelope-from=eschwartz@archlinux.org; helo=orion.archlinux.org |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. |
| X-Spam_score_int | -53 |
| X-Spam_score | -5.4 |
| X-Spam_bar | ----- |
| X-Spam_report | (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Spam_action | no action |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <f53f8a84-ac66-6d61-7066-01c14e8f2ce4@archlinux.org> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <CAL20dLDNniiOycTe-j6t0ynS+9FG32UgDGJbn+iDEMG7Ls_==Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16745 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 8/12/20 10:51 AM, Matthew Persico wrote: > I put a bug report into an emacs group because the bash syntax highlighter > failed to recognize functions whose names have dashes in them. > > The maintainer came back with this: > > I can reproduce this behaviour, but is it really a bug? Aren't the > names with '-' invalid? > The Bash Reference Manual says: > name > A word consisting solely of letters, numbers, and underscores, and > beginning with a letter or underscore. Names are used as shell > variable and function names. Also referred to as an identifier. > https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/bash/manual/bash.html > > I looked at the manual and I didn't see positive or negative > acknowledgement that dashes can be used in function names. But it does work. > > Update to manual? The bash-20191127 snapshot updated the manpage documentation for a function definition (to align with reality). It is now defined as: function fname [()] compound-command [redirection] and includes the description: When in posix mode, fname must be a valid shell name and may not be the name of one of the POSIX special builtins. In default mode, a function name can be any unquoted shell word that does not contain $. For context: word - A sequence of characters considered as a single unit by the shell. Also known as a token. name - A word consisting only of alphanumeric characters and underscores, and beginning with an alphabetic character or an underscore. Also referred to as an identifier. > name > A word consisting solely of letters, numbers, and underscores, and > beginning with a letter or underscore. Names are used as shell > variables. Also referred to as an identifier. > > function name > A word consisting solely of letters, numbers, underscores, dashes, and > beginning with a letter or underscore. Function names are used to label > shell > functions. > -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Dashes in function names: Undocumented? Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> - 2020-08-12 11:05 -0400
csiph-web