Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11528

Re: SIGINT handling

Path csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: SIGINT handling
Date Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:34:28 -0400
Lines 18
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.1554.1442864079.19560.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <20150918151439.GA16455@chaz.gmail.com> <20150919203628.GA27872@chaz.gmail.com> <20150921094807.GA6229@chaz.gmail.com>
Reply-To chet.ramey@case.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1442864080 32419 208.118.235.17 (21 Sep 2015 19:34:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, chet.ramey@case.edu
To Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@gmail.com>, bug-bash <bug-bash@gnu.org>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
In-Reply-To <20150921094807.GA6229@chaz.gmail.com>
X-Junkmail-Status score=10/60, host=mpv5.cwru.edu
X-Junkmail-Whitelist YES (by domain whitelist at mpv1.tis.cwru.edu)
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic]
X-Received-From 129.22.105.36
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.14
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:11528

Show key headers only | View raw


On 9/21/15 5:48 AM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:

> I'm not sure I prefer that WCE approach over WUE. Wouldn't it be
> preferable that applications that intercept SIGINT/QUIT/TSTP for
> anything other than clean-up before exit/suspend implement job
> control themselves instead (like vi's :! should create a process
> group and make that the foreground process group of the
> terminal so pressing ^C in sh -c vi, :!sleep 10, only sends the
> SIGINT to sleep)?

The classic example is emacs remapping the terminal intr key to ^G
and using SIGINT as its internal abort-command signal.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
		 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: SIGINT handling Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2015-09-21 15:34 -0400

csiph-web