Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #14225

Re: [PATCH] Add nofirstword completion option

Path csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add nofirstword completion option
Date Fri, 08 Jun 2018 15:40:56 +0100
Lines 107
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.1492.1528468869.1292.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <20180518110611.5099-1-bluca@debian.org> <96bcb197-40d1-aac8-c214-c513a6db805d@case.edu> <1527068652.6997.5.camel@debian.org> <76b1d3fa-4cb1-3e70-d93c-ada07c04dfa2@case.edu> <1527082457.6997.14.camel@debian.org> <4ccfc554-15a9-2ec1-55e1-b2df687f0bee@case.edu> <1527270167.6997.22.camel@debian.org> <3a98f6c5-0f1e-54aa-491c-da7100430ce8@case.edu> <1527605096.6997.27.camel@debian.org> <1527860403.6997.72.camel@debian.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bbE4RCaqqblFw/Ab3gTq"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1528468870 32384 208.118.235.17 (8 Jun 2018 14:41:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To chet.ramey@case.edu, bug-bash@gnu.org
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=JmNUi7YOaPAxptyqoj/4VV5Ah79UMKZ39IAOpinf7bU=; b=Btjc0FKG/QNinUy8l0hV44vobGpxzZrhzFRBOrTQyAXkOXBnyzMpWcCEPO4KdPXS6w NiiGYn4vdvOI2i6XVM6nVtynQdX7qizvUFH3suZ+YD8spsv8y9MNntT9fgvCbEOCmwal db9ELkvfo+GWu9YdpzhNkkJdSlLeQXPfmdulx0Hi+WmWZpsdLczNag6Qsx4F7vKVgthe QhYnx4Oxde2tStCKJAH8dIj55zrksJU1vyjzTo0pozRhMF7OE+t3uipYi3hGvrDQen0d DWS1DYHJTkc/lBoOk5TZaNQHTlJ6r6OgXz43oC1nTMouu26X1o9GKAxVTIFIgMFOAv9F SrTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State APt69E3+VtKZ84HdIpta8hXh4suip+nNHwJMVJWWxHmklPIDfPah5+it DOKqDrP9QF38r18UoyaSXhY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source ADUXVKJENszMiEP9FhajSaZ7MDZ2JXU4km/o4PMa+RjOuqKPlJK+leowg9pqVu4zFQdGA2nSKAL8IA==
X-Received by 2002:adf:c3c2:: with SMTP id d2-v6mr5343612wrg.68.1528468858817; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 07:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <1527860403.6997.72.camel@debian.org>
X-Mailer Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Received-From 209.85.128.196
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:14225

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 14:40 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 15:44 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 14:40 -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > > On 5/25/18 1:42 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > There is already logic that determines whether the shell is
> > > > > trying to
> > > > > complete a command word (in_command_position). The existing
> > > > > code
> > > > > does
> > > > > not attempt programmable completion if in_command_position ==
> > > > > 1.
> > > > > The
> > > > > additional functionality would:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 1. Add an option to the complete builtin to specify how to
> > > > > complete
> > > > >    command names, and store it in a specially-named compspec,
> > > > > like
> > > > >    completion for empty lines does.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2. Add code to invoke that completion, if it exists and
> > > > > programmable
> > > > >    completion is active, before attempting bash's default
> > > > > completion,
> > > > >    if in_command_position == 1.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Chet
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for the guidance! Unfortunately I'm still not quite
> > > > there
> > > > yet -
> > > > inlined are the changes based on my understanding of the above.
> > > > It
> > > > implements a "usercmd/-U" option similar to the existing -E for
> > > > empty
> > > > line.
> > > > 
> > > > But at the moment all it does is to allow (via "complete -U -F
> > > > foo") to
> > > > complete when nothing is typed in, which seemed to be possible
> > > > already
> > > > with -E. If some characters are already typed in, it will still
> > > > do
> > > > the
> > > > default completion to commands in the PATH.
> > > > 
> > > > What have I missed?
> > > 
> > > You should make sure you don't add your code in the section with
> > > the
> > > rest
> > > of the programmable completions, since that block is not entered
> > > if
> > > in_command_position != 0.
> > 
> > Thanks for the suggestion, it works perfectly now!
> > 
> > Inlined is the latest revision, with added documentation. Let me
> > know
> > if you'd like me to change anything.
> 
> Hello Chet,
> 
> Just noticed other devs sent patches as attachments rather than
> inline,
> so just in case that's a more convenient form to review I'm including
> the diff as an attachment.
> 
> Thanks!

Hi Chet,

Any chance you had a sec to look at the diff? Would love some feedback!

Thanks!

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] Add nofirstword completion option Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2018-06-08 15:40 +0100

csiph-web