Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16367

Re: Vi mode and g commands

Path csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Newsgroups gnu.bash.bug
Subject Re: Vi mode and g commands
Date Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:34:34 -0400
Lines 30
Approved bug-bash@gnu.org
Message-ID <mailman.1434.1591623278.2541.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink)
References <CADB0MOOUui+hUpwsNsX-XLxcjSfE+sEox8cRA4hG7x1ksT49zQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200608133434.GA4133@eeg.ccf.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.gnu.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1591623279 28478 209.51.188.17 (8 Jun 2020 13:34:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
Cc bug-bash@gnu.org
To Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>
Envelope-to bug-bash@gnu.org
Mail-Followup-To Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>, bug-bash@gnu.org
Content-Disposition inline
In-Reply-To <CADB0MOOUui+hUpwsNsX-XLxcjSfE+sEox8cRA4hG7x1ksT49zQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Received-SPF none client-ip=139.137.100.1; envelope-from=wooledg@eeg.ccf.org; helo=mail.eeg.ccf.org
X-detected-operating-system by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/08 09:34:34
X-ACL-Warn Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy]
X-Spam_score_int -18
X-Spam_score -1.9
X-Spam_bar -
X-Spam_report (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN
X-Spam_action no action
X-BeenThere bug-bash@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.23
Precedence list
List-Id Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash>
List-Post <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org>
List-Help <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <20200608133434.GA4133@eeg.ccf.org>
X-Mailman-Original-References <CADB0MOOUui+hUpwsNsX-XLxcjSfE+sEox8cRA4hG7x1ksT49zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16367

Show key headers only | View raw


On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 02:28:05AM +0100, Dan Shearer wrote:
> Some g commands are implemented, but incorrectly. Examples:
> * g0 is equivalent to 0, rather than 'beginning of screen line when wrapped'
> * g$ is equivalent to $, rather than 'end of screen line when wrapped'
> 
> Other g commands are not implemented, just ignored. Examples:
> * gM is ignored, rather than going to the middle of the line
> * gE is ignored, rather than going to the end of the last word

Those are not standard vi commands, as far as I can tell.  They appear
to be vim extensions.

I opened /usr/bin/vi on HP-UX 11i and typed a line that was longer than
my terminal's width, and then tried these commands.  They do not do what
you describe.

In real vi, in an 80-wide terminal, with a single line of 120 or so
characters, and the cursor at position 40, g$ acts just like $.

With the cursor now at the end of the line, g0 acts just like 0.

gE acts just like E (moves to the end of the current word).

gM acts just like M (moves to the start of the middle line, which happens
to be the first line, because there's only one line).

I see no evidence that 'g' is even a meaningful keystroke in real vi.
Maybe that's why vim chose it as the prefix for so many of their
extension commands.

Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Vi mode and g commands Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-06-08 09:34 -0400

csiph-web