Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #15676
| Path | csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: set -e ignored in subshell if part of command list |
| Date | Wed, 13 Nov 2019 11:53:57 -0500 |
| Lines | 80 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1356.1573664061.13325.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAMhR0U1fzAvXMVZacEYf9yAPwgq_6Gz5C-99dj6xt=9pQMtX8Q@mail.gmail.com> <13040a55-507d-e072-e827-be7c33be968f@case.edu> <CAMhR0U3yqJ5N-gMCOK7SspOJcdcOCEtu_+cV3=zUgr7fJmkRRQ@mail.gmail.com> <2090944b-674f-6be3-f8a4-ad0d49ec44ed@archlinux.org> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9qZVgc8K1doNoq2nZoVZX0oPzBfjIGq67" |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1573664062 2811 209.51.188.17 (13 Nov 2019 16:54:22 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=archlinux.org; s=orion; t=1573664045; bh=QelosS4Kph92B8WIbk3s/J+Drqjy8Ql8q56CDhVDyhI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=yI1syAVn7bnD41RccE99gUpQ3T6YaRZbsK4d6ZRofgIelXC2TtjVGEF4vqMtz2vpn yyDZCbGe01e7ucnv9yqS1Wia0A6TaCf3Vli8UBuwBDvPMM3dSw74IpYcD310LNlQ7R kq8OR37/ZcraVYCH8OjW18VbPy2lGykNlb/S5Rg9elLa/YEm0FrqtJv/TjfCvq7cQY DggMkUN81cfR6EJiZ3pDIT7HHEaSO6RSAAVCS824YNWMFh4clttz9TnA1jT2JpxL8U 6mj6Ctk4rQXYLNEeE2RQ0V4l1rFSJtEvIERD8ZYYz+G//uK5rYO7QRgBKCxAa8S24O d0GNJoxDND3LbnfC76tMtzBEOsRYxxk7zqKW9B6iKnNZ2SMOmqT+Rk+yo1Uu+MTwvd Nzl4KRbJ0SpSRm4HNFTFb6pF7Kk4zaWmHTUMJPNF7ZgJVI7oZjbDFnTdZm9WKSc1Ao DC+ArYlZqBE9XslvrJ4UGnXVJ3ilui02J8axpvnQ854cOMaVBu+YxhcgH1sZ0OqvYY Y3s0OTHj8nDnDlh+zmHsoJNY2aISpqhWNpwP7aztearPV5NuCIoBg7RgFK7ORk7sdv zKWUqPVEuLARYsmGEZ45kTOuHo0bV5VQS6PnNd+alM6EcrkmgrNHw2Mn5H3ZjsVbkn 27gt6xBreVw3uBE4oAd+fCYs= |
| X-Clacks-Overhead | GNU Terry Pratchett |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
| In-Reply-To | <CAMhR0U3yqJ5N-gMCOK7SspOJcdcOCEtu_+cV3=zUgr7fJmkRRQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] |
| X-Received-From | 88.198.91.70 |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <2090944b-674f-6be3-f8a4-ad0d49ec44ed@archlinux.org> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <CAMhR0U1fzAvXMVZacEYf9yAPwgq_6Gz5C-99dj6xt=9pQMtX8Q@mail.gmail.com> <13040a55-507d-e072-e827-be7c33be968f@case.edu> <CAMhR0U3yqJ5N-gMCOK7SspOJcdcOCEtu_+cV3=zUgr7fJmkRRQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:15676 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 11/13/19 10:59 AM, Shaun Crampton wrote: > But the commands in the subshell execute inside a different shell > execution context so they shouldn't have > their own set -e context (Section 2.12)? > > I don't see where the spec says that the subshell has to inherit the > and/or list-ness of the > parent context. Section 2.12 doesn't mention that as being one of the > things that a subshell inherits > (and unless I'm missing a good use-case, it seems like a pretty > useless thing to inherit in a subshell > or a function that happens to be called on the LHS of an and/or). You're trying to defend the behavior you *want* set -e to have, even though many people rely on set -e having the behavior it does, indeed, have. Why do you require that yet another behavior change be made, so that it is even harder to know what set -e will do across various shells, and across various *versions* of a shell? set -e already has more than enough exceptions to every single rule it ever had. It's a collection of inchoate nonsensical lexical rules. Don't use it, for all the reasons enumerated here: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/105 Everyone will be much happier if they just don't use set -e, and, instead, implement actual real error handling that a) works, b) does what they expect in their own special snowflake case. -- Eli Schwartz Arch Linux Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: set -e ignored in subshell if part of command list Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> - 2019-11-13 11:53 -0500
csiph-web