Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11944
| From | ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Installation of PDF/PS/DVI and HTML files |
| Date | 2015-12-04 11:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1331.1449221091.31583.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87lh9bu6w2.fsf@gnu.org> <20151203151351.GT27325@eeg.ccf.org> |
Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> skribis: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:08:13PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Given that the GCS suggests installing only the Info version of the >> manual by default (info "(standards) Standard Targets") > >> What do you think? > > I think that's a stupid suggestion. The de facto standard for "make" > followed "make install" on a Unix-like system is to install man pages. > If there's an info page, I have no objection to installing that as well, > but to omit the standard man pages by default is ridiculous. Agreed; apologies for being unclear. As Mathieu wrote, I am of course fine installing man and Info manuals by default, like GNU packages generally do. The suggestion I make is to not install PDF/PS/DVI and HTML files by default. This would comply with the GCS and user expectations, and also sidestep the bit-for-bit reproducibility issues that generating those PDF/PS/DVI/HTML files entails. What do you think? Thanks, Ludo’.
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Installation of PDF/PS/DVI and HTML files ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) - 2015-12-04 11:24 +0200
csiph-web