Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16621
| Path | csiph.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@ispras.ru> |
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: No word splitting for assignment-like expressions in compound assignment |
| Date | Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:25:07 +0300 |
| Lines | 43 |
| Approved | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.130.1595834719.2739.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87o8o1zfpn.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <F420E583-E5D4-48BB-98E3-044C700BA07A@larryv.me> <e64878396a22641351ff3b910fdc99d8@ispras.ru> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.gnu.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1595834719 4976 209.51.188.17 (27 Jul 2020 07:25:19 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| Cc | "Dale R. Worley" <worley@alum.mit.edu>, bug-bash@gnu.org |
| To | Lawrence Velázquez <vq@larryv.me> |
| Envelope-to | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| In-Reply-To | <F420E583-E5D4-48BB-98E3-044C700BA07A@larryv.me> |
| User-Agent | Roundcube Webmail/1.4.4 |
| X-Sender | izbyshev@ispras.ru |
| Received-SPF | pass client-ip=83.149.199.84; envelope-from=izbyshev@ispras.ru; helo=mail.ispras.ru |
| X-detected-operating-system | by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/27 03:25:08 |
| X-ACL-Warn | Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer |
| X-Spam_score_int | -18 |
| X-Spam_score | -1.9 |
| X-Spam_bar | - |
| X-Spam_report | (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Spam_action | no action |
| X-BeenThere | bug-bash@gnu.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.23 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell <bug-bash.gnu.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bug-bash@gnu.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash>, <mailto:bug-bash-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <e64878396a22641351ff3b910fdc99d8@ispras.ru> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <87o8o1zfpn.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <F420E583-E5D4-48BB-98E3-044C700BA07A@larryv.me> |
| Xref | csiph.com gnu.bash.bug:16621 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2020-07-27 10:06, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >> On Jul 27, 2020, at 1:31 AM, Dale R. Worley <worley@alum.mit.edu> >> wrote: >> Interesting. The documentation for 4.2.53(1) says this about >> parameter >> assignments generally, with no special rules for compound assignments: >> >> All >> values undergo tilde expansion, parameter and variable >> expansion, com- >> mand substitution, arithmetic expansion, and quote removal (see >> EXPAN- >> SION below). ... Word splitting is not >> performed, with the exception of "$@" as explained below under >> Special >> Parameters. Pathname expansion is not performed. >> >> So it seems like the word splitting in "A=(X$Z)" is incorrect. So is >> pathname expansion in that context. > > > If word splitting were not performed in compound assignments, this... > > foo=(a b c) > > ...would not work. If pathname expansion were not performed in compound > assignments, this... > > foo=(*) > > ...would not work. Arrays would become significantly less usable if > word splitting and pathname expansion were not allowed in compound > assignments. > To be clear, I don't consider word splitting and expansions in compound assignments to be a problem: this is well-known and long-standing behavior, even though it doesn't seem to be explicitly documented. In particular, I expect word splitting to happen in "A=(X$Z)" case. But I expect it to happen in "A=(X=$Z)" too, and the lack of it seems unintentional to me. Alexey
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: No word splitting for assignment-like expressions in compound assignment Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@ispras.ru> - 2020-07-27 10:25 +0300
csiph-web