Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #16550
| From | Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: foo | tee /dev/stderr | bar # << thanks! |
| Date | 2020-07-07 08:50 -0400 |
| Organization | ITS, Case Western Reserve University |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1084.1594126212.2574.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87k0zgxfl4.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <ed8db9c3-b334-73be-3b55-6401934fdfc9@case.edu> |
On 7/6/20 9:45 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote: > bug-bash@trodman.com writes: >> foo | tee >(cat >&2) | bar > > I do wonder how portable >( ... ) is in practice, versus the portability > of /dev/stderr. It's portable in the sense that it's available wherever bash is. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: foo | tee /dev/stderr | bar # << thanks! Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> - 2020-07-07 08:50 -0400
csiph-web