Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > fr.comp.lang.ada > #2335
| From | Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | fr.comp.lang.ada, comp.lang.ada |
| Subject | Re: Canal+ crash |
| Date | 2024-07-21 11:00 +0300 |
| Organization | Tidorum Ltd |
| Message-ID | <lg3th4F90ggU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <v7fokv$3ehcr$1@dont-email.me> <v7fpql$3en28$1@dont-email.me> <v7fuqu$3fihj$1@dont-email.me> <v7hmrc$3p5q7$8@dont-email.me> <v7icut$654$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2024-07-21 10:22, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 2024-07-21 03:04, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 11:08:47 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> >>> On 2024-07-20 09:43, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 09:23:11 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >>>> >>>>> It is about the fundamental principle that security cannot be added on >>>>> top of an insecure system. >>>> >>>> Actually, it can. Notice how the Internet itself is horribly insecure, >>>> yet we are capable of running secure applications and protocols on top >>>> of it. >>> >>> Why on earth do we need security updates? >> >> Because computer systems are complex, and new bugs keep being discovered >> all the time. > > This does not make sense. You can create a very complex system out of > screwdrivers and still each screwdriver would require no update. > > Systems consist of computers and computers of software modules. There is > nothing inherently complex about making a module safe and bug free. > Security interactions are primitive and 100% functional. There is no > difficult issues with non-functional stuff like real-time problems. Well, several recent attacks use variations in execution timing as a side-channel to exfiltrate secrets such as crypto keys. The crypto code can be functionally perfect and bug-free, but it may still be open to attack by such methods. But certainly, most attacks on SW have used functional bugs such as buffer overflows.
Back to fr.comp.lang.ada | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Canal+ crash Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2024-07-19 23:41 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-20 09:23 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-20 07:43 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-20 11:08 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-21 01:04 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-21 09:22 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2024-07-21 11:00 +0300
Re: Canal+ crash "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> - 2024-07-21 11:10 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-21 11:34 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2024-07-21 13:11 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-21 21:53 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> - 2024-07-22 08:36 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-23 01:48 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-21 11:19 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2024-07-21 14:31 +0300
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-21 18:49 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-21 21:55 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-21 21:52 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-22 09:16 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-23 01:49 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2024-07-23 09:06 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-23 08:36 +0000
Re: Canal+ crash Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-07-27 23:41 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-10-20 23:30 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-10-24 12:46 +0200
Re: Canal+ crash Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-10-30 09:30 +0100
csiph-web