Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > england.legal > #2

case summary for an application notice

From Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK>
Newsgroups uk.legal, free.uk.legal, england.legal, free.uk.legal.public-law
Subject case summary for an application notice
Date 2023-07-31 10:06 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <8d28854a-548d-131c-36f2-183d7d15610@insomnia247.nl> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

A case summary is needed for an application notice but files at Gov.UK are 
not consistent about case summaries. Is the following by me - based on 
Form PLO2 (04.08) plo2-eng.doc - good enough?

"Case Summary
Claim No. KB-2023-002906
de Glouceſter versus Lonergan and others

This process is about defamations; malicious falsehoods; misuses of 
private and confidential informations; breaches against confidence, 
data-protection legislation and the Communications Act 2003; harassment 
by publication; and intentional infliction of mental harm concealing 
torture and another crime against humanity (namely persecution); and 
murders happened because de these defamations; and Portugal tortured on 
behalf de a fraudster paid by UK taxes.

A judge falsely said on 14/07/2023 that this court cannot give remedies. 
Please set aside or vary that order.

        Agreed Key Issues:
On 02/06/2010 this 3rd defendant invited this claimant to write to it, 
which he did.
This 3rd defendant and a representative thereof don’t understand Gaelic.
No defendant disputes these proposed meanings.

Related processes:
Process
Parties
Court/Body
Stage reached
Comments

Process Number 373/13.5TBCBR
Portugal and this claimant
3º Juízo Criminal de Coimbra
concluded
This claimant was defamed and tortured (verified by a European Court of 
Human Rights) with no lawyer with no interpreter to sign a false 
confession (which he did not understand is false because he was lied to 
about what it means).

335/14.5BECBR
This claimant and Portugal’s Foundation for Science and Technology
Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
concluded



This claimant and Coimbra University

ongoing
Commenced during 2012. Administrative.

This claimant and Coimbra University

ongoing
Anti-defamation.
00259/12.0BECBR
This claimant and Instituto Superior Politécnico de Coimbra
Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
concluded

1197/12.2TACBR
This claimant and Paulo Alexandre Cunha Gomes
Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court by admittedly 
accepting known perjury to be true

slander
220/14.0T9CBR
This claimant and Rui Miguel Curado da Silva
Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court


322/17.1PCCBR
This claimant and Rui Miguel Curado da Silva
Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court: rejected


229328/2013 2013224596
This claimant and Coimbra University
Alternative dispute resolution
failed

333/11.0BECBR
This claimant and Portugal’s Foundation for Science and Technology
Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
concluded

...




123/14.9PFCBR
Portugal; Maria Filomena de Osório Pinto dos Santos Figueiredo; Coimbra 
University; and this claimant
Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Coimbra,
Juízo Central Criminal de Coimbra – Juiz 2
concluded



Key Date
Step to be taken
Reason for non-compliance
09/03/2023
Cooperation by these 1st and 2nd defendants with a pre-action protocol.
These 1st to 2nd defendants are guilty.
03/05/2023
Answers to these questions: “Where are the readers of these articles? 
(Clearly one reader of an article about me by Cofina Media, S.A. is in 
England and Wales. How many readers of each such article is in England 
and Wales?) What are the words about me that Cofina Media, S.A. published 
to The Color Company (TM) Limited?”
These 1st to 2nd defendants refuse to cooperate. Supposedly “the letter 
was not very clear” says a representative for this 3rd defendant.
03/05/2023
Satisfactory response to: “Did those communications of 02/06/2010 benefit 
me? I do not know of a report by Cofina Media, S.A. which is based on any 
of those communications. Please give me a copy of each such report.”
Supposedly “the letter was not very clear” says a representative for this 
3rd defendant."
said Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter.

Back to england.legal | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

case summary for an application notice Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2023-07-31 10:06 +0200

csiph-web