Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.legal, free.uk.legal, england.legal, free.uk.legal.public-law |
| Subject | case summary for an application notice |
| Date | 2023-07-31 10:06 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <8d28854a-548d-131c-36f2-183d7d15610@insomnia247.nl> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
A case summary is needed for an application notice but files at Gov.UK are
not consistent about case summaries. Is the following by me - based on
Form PLO2 (04.08) plo2-eng.doc - good enough?
"Case Summary
Claim No. KB-2023-002906
de Glouceſter versus Lonergan and others
This process is about defamations; malicious falsehoods; misuses of
private and confidential informations; breaches against confidence,
data-protection legislation and the Communications Act 2003; harassment
by publication; and intentional infliction of mental harm concealing
torture and another crime against humanity (namely persecution); and
murders happened because de these defamations; and Portugal tortured on
behalf de a fraudster paid by UK taxes.
A judge falsely said on 14/07/2023 that this court cannot give remedies.
Please set aside or vary that order.
Agreed Key Issues:
On 02/06/2010 this 3rd defendant invited this claimant to write to it,
which he did.
This 3rd defendant and a representative thereof don’t understand Gaelic.
No defendant disputes these proposed meanings.
Related processes:
Process
Parties
Court/Body
Stage reached
Comments
Process Number 373/13.5TBCBR
Portugal and this claimant
3º Juízo Criminal de Coimbra
concluded
This claimant was defamed and tortured (verified by a European Court of
Human Rights) with no lawyer with no interpreter to sign a false
confession (which he did not understand is false because he was lied to
about what it means).
335/14.5BECBR
This claimant and Portugal’s Foundation for Science and Technology
Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
concluded
This claimant and Coimbra University
ongoing
Commenced during 2012. Administrative.
This claimant and Coimbra University
ongoing
Anti-defamation.
00259/12.0BECBR
This claimant and Instituto Superior Politécnico de Coimbra
Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
concluded
1197/12.2TACBR
This claimant and Paulo Alexandre Cunha Gomes
Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court by admittedly
accepting known perjury to be true
slander
220/14.0T9CBR
This claimant and Rui Miguel Curado da Silva
Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court
322/17.1PCCBR
This claimant and Rui Miguel Curado da Silva
Public-prosecution service prevents reaching court: rejected
229328/2013 2013224596
This claimant and Coimbra University
Alternative dispute resolution
failed
333/11.0BECBR
This claimant and Portugal’s Foundation for Science and Technology
Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte
concluded
...
123/14.9PFCBR
Portugal; Maria Filomena de Osório Pinto dos Santos Figueiredo; Coimbra
University; and this claimant
Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Coimbra,
Juízo Central Criminal de Coimbra – Juiz 2
concluded
Key Date
Step to be taken
Reason for non-compliance
09/03/2023
Cooperation by these 1st and 2nd defendants with a pre-action protocol.
These 1st to 2nd defendants are guilty.
03/05/2023
Answers to these questions: “Where are the readers of these articles?
(Clearly one reader of an article about me by Cofina Media, S.A. is in
England and Wales. How many readers of each such article is in England
and Wales?) What are the words about me that Cofina Media, S.A. published
to The Color Company (TM) Limited?”
These 1st to 2nd defendants refuse to cooperate. Supposedly “the letter
was not very clear” says a representative for this 3rd defendant.
03/05/2023
Satisfactory response to: “Did those communications of 02/06/2010 benefit
me? I do not know of a report by Cofina Media, S.A. which is based on any
of those communications. Please give me a copy of each such report.”
Supposedly “the letter was not very clear” says a representative for this
3rd defendant."
said Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter.
Back to england.legal | Previous | Next | Find similar
case summary for an application notice Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2023-07-31 10:06 +0200
csiph-web