Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.windows.x > #558

Re: why X

From gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Newsgroups comp.windows.x
Subject Re: why X
Date 2024-05-22 15:51 +0000
Organization The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID <v2l4at$19ra3$2@news.xmission.com> (permalink)
References <E9TTqC5XlaglCPCF@violet.siamics.net> <slrnv4ktqj.pi7.anthk@localhost.localdomain> <v2etjf$3savv$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <v2etjf$3savv$1@dont-email.me>,  <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
...
>It seems to me the main argument for Wayland is "Its not X". When you try and

Change or die.

(aka, change for change's sake)

>find out what its actual advantages are you get vague nonsense about 
>security and lack of cruft and a faster graphic instruction -> hardware path 
>, which may be true but the difference will be minimal with modern X 
>extensions and all but invisible with 99.9% of graphical applications unless
>you maybe care about 60fps vs 65fps in some game.
>

The Raspberry Pi world recently made the switch.  They claim better
performance on their "big" boards (the Pi4 and Pi5), but retain X for their
earlier models.

Which, on the face of it, is odd, since you would think you'd care the most
about performance on the lesser boards.  No, I'm not looking for an
explanation of this.

-- 
Hindsight is (supposed to be) 2020.

Trumpers, don't make the same mistake twice.
Don't shoot yourself in the feet - and everywhere else - again!.

Back to comp.windows.x | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

why X Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2024-05-11 17:35 +0000
  Re: why X Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-05-11 20:07 +0200
    Re: why X Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2024-05-22 09:25 +0000
      Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-22 22:07 +0000
        Re: why X Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2024-05-23 13:57 +0000
          Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-23 22:00 +0000
            Re: why X Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-05-24 08:47 +0000
  Re: why X not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-05-15 09:37 +1000
    Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-15 00:48 +0000
      Re: why X not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-05-16 09:05 +1000
        Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-16 00:06 +0000
          Re: why X Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-05-16 17:18 +1000
    Re: why X Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2024-05-22 08:55 +0000
      Re: why X not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-05-24 09:41 +1000
        Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-24 00:29 +0000
      Re: why X Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-05-24 21:35 +1000
        Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-24 21:37 +0000
  Re: why X Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> - 2024-05-20 06:43 +0000
    Re: why X Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-05-20 07:20 +0000
      Re: why X gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2024-05-22 15:51 +0000
    Re: why X Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-20 22:29 +0000
      Re: why X Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-05-21 07:20 +0000

csiph-web