Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.sys.prime > #473

Re: Pr1me OAS again

From bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.prime
Subject Re: Pr1me OAS again
Date 2023-12-11 10:18 -0500
Message-ID <ktonioF2la0U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <WemcnX8A4YIXkuz4nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ktmabtF9ajU1@mid.individual.net> <kYKcnaawnb-tZ-j4nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ktmkaqF2l9vU1@mid.individual.net> <oLKdnXSfzc43GOv4nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/10/2023 10:44 PM, Dennis Boone wrote:
>   > I think you missed the point.  They didn't do the required benchmarks.
>   > They couldn't because the machine they were bidding didn't exist and
>   > wouldn't exist for at least 6 months.  And yet, they won.
> 
> No, I didn't miss it.  OTOH, did it really make any difference in the
> outcome, given the guy who was going to buy a VAX no matter what?  Who

No, but who would have expected this going into n RFP?

> didn't put the BSD requirement in the RFQ?

Three guesses.
I still keep one of the textbooks he wrote to remind me.  :-}

bill

Back to comp.sys.prime | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Pr1me OAS again Peter Ruscoe <plruscoe@gmail.com> - 2023-11-28 15:17 -0800
  Re: Pr1me OAS again drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-11-30 01:32 +0000
    Re: Pr1me OAS again bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> - 2023-11-30 09:14 -0500
      Re: Pr1me OAS again drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-12-07 00:19 +0000
        Re: Pr1me OAS again bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> - 2023-12-10 12:20 -0500
          Re: Pr1me OAS again drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-12-10 17:49 +0000
            Re: Pr1me OAS again bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> - 2023-12-10 15:10 -0500
              Re: Pr1me OAS again drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-12-11 03:44 +0000
                Re: Pr1me OAS again bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 10:18 -0500

csiph-web