Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: bill Newsgroups: comp.sys.prime Subject: Re: Pr1me OAS again Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:18:40 -0500 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <74b2c3cc-2867-4d39-9007-5b179e8b2c27n@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net mzrhaZPYktcg7eRgKaP1EgZ+YU962YKa9KLwGecd/4tZxq9lu1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:obU9XcwAbedpjF7hO2yXKJQsIUY= sha256:gSC+sT49BqB+w28OkyvitQY5rbn8voG+SeTND2pEthg= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.prime:473 On 12/10/2023 10:44 PM, Dennis Boone wrote: > > I think you missed the point. They didn't do the required benchmarks. > > They couldn't because the machine they were bidding didn't exist and > > wouldn't exist for at least 6 months. And yet, they won. > > No, I didn't miss it. OTOH, did it really make any difference in the > outcome, given the guy who was going to buy a VAX no matter what? Who No, but who would have expected this going into n RFP? > didn't put the BSD requirement in the RFQ? Three guesses. I still keep one of the textbooks he wrote to remind me. :-} bill