Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #102213 > unrolled thread
| Started by | csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-11 18:23 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-03-12 17:27 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 51 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Fake Email From Apple csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) - 2017-03-11 18:23 -0800
Re: Fake Email From Apple nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-11 21:24 -0500
Re: Fake Email From Apple Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-03-12 16:17 +0000
Re: Fake Email From Apple dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) - 2017-03-14 09:48 +0000
Re: Fake Email From Apple nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-14 06:00 -0400
Re: Fake Email From Apple befr@eaglesoft.de (Bernd Fröhlich) - 2017-03-14 11:36 +0100
Re: Fake Email From Apple Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-03-14 16:02 +0000
Re: Fake Email From Apple dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-03-15 07:28 +1100
Re: Fake Email !From Apple David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> - 2017-03-12 12:50 -0500
Re: Fake Email !From Apple nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-12 13:51 -0500
Re: Fake Email !From Apple David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> - 2017-03-12 17:30 -0500
Re: Fake Email !From Apple nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-12 18:33 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2017-03-13 16:38 +1100
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-12 22:45 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 18:55 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-13 00:39 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 21:03 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-13 01:28 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 00:39 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2017-03-14 09:58 +1300
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-14 21:05 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 17:41 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-03-14 21:50 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-15 05:20 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-03-15 15:07 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-15 16:07 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-03-15 16:34 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-15 17:58 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-03-15 19:32 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-03-18 14:51 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2017-03-15 13:21 +1300
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2017-03-13 04:28 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-13 17:31 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2017-03-13 14:30 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2017-03-13 15:17 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2017-03-13 23:33 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2017-03-13 14:36 +1300
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-13 03:54 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 00:35 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Nelson <nelson@nowhere.com> - 2017-03-13 05:04 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-13 17:27 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-03-13 14:13 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-03-13 11:59 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2017-03-14 09:58 +1300
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2017-03-14 21:09 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-03-14 17:53 -0400
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-03-14 23:40 +0000
Re: Fake Email !From Apple dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2017-03-15 13:21 +1300
Re: Fake Email !From Apple Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-03-13 14:10 +0000
Re: Fake Email From Apple JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-03-12 17:27 -0400
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | csampson@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-11 18:23 -0800 |
| Subject | Fake Email From Apple |
| Message-ID | <1n2qiyq.84ctq8teexd6N%csampson@inetworld.net> |
I recently got a couple of emails from Apple titled "Your Apple ID was used to sign in to FaceTime on an iPhone 5: and "Your Apple ID was used to sign in to iCloud on an iPhone 6". Now I don't have any model of iPhone and I didn't remember setting up an Apple ID, or using iCloud or FaceTime. So I figured that somebody was impersonating me and I should probably put a stop to it. I clicked on the supplied link and after a minute of so I noticed that I was at a web site whose URL ended in .ru. I closed that window immediately. Did they plant a Trojan Horse? So far, no trouble, but a Trojan Horse could be lurking until some future date. I happen to have a recent backup (3:00 a.m. this morning) but wiping out everything and restoring it would be a pain. Charlie -- Nobody in this country got rich on his own. You built a factory--good. But you moved your goods on roads we all paid for. You hired workers we all paid to educate. So keep a big hunk of the money from your factory. But take a hunk and pay it forward. Elizabeth Warren (paraphrased)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-11 21:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <110320172124460075%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #102213 |
In article <1n2qiyq.84ctq8teexd6N%csampson@inetworld.net>, Charles H. Sampson <csampson@inetworld.net> wrote: > I recently got a couple of emails from Apple titled "Your Apple ID was > used to sign in to FaceTime on an iPhone 5: and "Your Apple ID was used > to sign in to iCloud on an iPhone 6". Now I don't have any model of > iPhone and I didn't remember setting up an Apple ID, or using iCloud or > FaceTime. So I figured that somebody was impersonating me and I should > probably put a stop to it. I clicked on the supplied link and after a > minute of so I noticed that I was at a web site whose URL ended in .ru. > I closed that window immediately. > > Did they plant a Trojan Horse? So far, no trouble, but a Trojan Horse > could be lurking until some future date. I happen to have a recent > backup (3:00 a.m. this morning) but wiping out everything and restoring > it would be a pain. highly unlikely. they wanted you to log into your apple id account so they could get your password.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-12 16:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnocatb0.ih9.g.kreme@snow.local> |
| In reply to | #102213 |
In message <1n2qiyq.84ctq8teexd6N%csampson@inetworld.net> Charles H. Sampson <csampson@inetworld.net> wrote: > I recently got a couple of emails from Apple No you didn't. > I clicked on the supplied link Never click a link in an email. -- It was all very well going about pure logic and how the universe was ruled by logic and the harmony of numbers, but the plain fact was that the disc was manifestly traversing space on the back of a giant turtle and the gods had a habit of going round to atheists' houses and smashing their windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 09:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1n2te7i.n4tsg01v36dy9N%dcohenspam@talktalk.net> |
| In reply to | #102226 |
Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > Never click a link in an email. I wish legit firms made it easier to avoid clicking on links when they make special offers. Case in point. A recent email from Micromat with an offer for anupgrade to TechTool Pro with a link to click. No, I didn't click the link, I went direct to the Micromat site but the offer wasn't on the site. So I emailed Micromat sales to enquire if the email was genuine. They confirmed that it was and that the link was the only way to get the offer. And there are plenty of other similar cases. -- <http://www.decohen.com> The Labyrinth of the Heart: Changed Myths for Changing Lives book and e-book <http://www.decohen.com/labyrinth.htm> Send e-mail to the Reply-To address, not the From address.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 06:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <140320170600160336%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #102293 |
In article <1n2te7i.n4tsg01v36dy9N%dcohenspam@talktalk.net>, Daniel Cohen <dcohenspam@talktalk.net> wrote: > > Never click a link in an email. > > I wish legit firms made it easier to avoid clicking on links when they > make special offers. > > Case in point. A recent email from Micromat with an offer for anupgrade > to TechTool Pro with a link to click. > > No, I didn't click the link, I went direct to the Micromat site but the > offer wasn't on the site. So I emailed Micromat sales to enquire if the > email was genuine. > > They confirmed that it was and that the link was the only way to get the > offer. they could have sent a unique promo code to those targeted for the offer, the way other companies do it. if it was an upgrade offer for an existing product, then use the serial number of the previous version, which the recipient of the email already has, so no unique code or link would be needed. > And there are plenty of other similar cases. none that are worthwhile.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | befr@eaglesoft.de (Bernd Fröhlich) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 11:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1n2vk1v.d9cn851q7oig2N%befr@eaglesoft.de> |
| In reply to | #102293 |
Daniel Cohen <dcohenspam@talktalk.net> wrote: > Case in point. A recent email from Micromat with an offer for anupgrade > to TechTool Pro with a link to click. I was a TechTool Pro user too. One of the reasons they lost me was their terrible emails.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 16:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <eiqig1Ffg5pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #102293 |
On 2017-03-14, Daniel Cohen <dcohenspam@talktalk.net> wrote: > Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > >> Never click a link in an email. > > I wish legit firms made it easier to avoid clicking on links when they > make special offers. > > Case in point. A recent email from Micromat with an offer for anupgrade > to TechTool Pro with a link to click. > > No, I didn't click the link, I went direct to the Micromat site but the > offer wasn't on the site. So I emailed Micromat sales to enquire if the > email was genuine. > > They confirmed that it was and that the link was the only way to get the > offer. > > And there are plenty of other similar cases. It's very easy to verify that a message is legitimate by examining the headers and looking to see where the links actually point. I don't see a problem. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-15 07:28 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <do_ray_me-A1D3F6.07282615032017@46.sub-75-242-165.myvzw.com> |
| In reply to | #102293 |
In article <1n2te7i.n4tsg01v36dy9N%dcohenspam@talktalk.net>, dcohenspam@talktalk.net (Daniel Cohen) wrote: > Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > > > Never click a link in an email. Or go out in the dark, or on your own... What crap! -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-12 12:50 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703121243590.92604@mako.ath.cx> |
| In reply to | #102213 |
On Saturday, 11 March 2017 18:23 -0800, in article <1n2qiyq.84ctq8teexd6N%csampson@inetworld.net>, Charles H. Sampson <csampson@inetworld.net> wrote: > I recently got a couple of emails from Apple titled "Your Apple ID was > used to sign in to FaceTime on an iPhone 5: and "Your Apple ID was used > to sign in to iCloud on an iPhone 6". As others have pointed out, this was a phish, attempting to convince you to provide your Apple ID credentials. Apple ID phishing has jumped substantially over the last couple of months. It's worth being aware of this and constantly wary. -- David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> Never underestimate the gullibility of the average user.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-12 13:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <120320171351537547%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #102228 |
In article <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703121243590.92604@mako.ath.cx>, David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> wrote: > > I recently got a couple of emails from Apple titled "Your Apple ID was > > used to sign in to FaceTime on an iPhone 5: and "Your Apple ID was used > > to sign in to iCloud on an iPhone 6". > > As others have pointed out, this was a phish, attempting to convince > you to provide your Apple ID credentials. Apple ID phishing has > jumped substantially over the last couple of months. It's worth being > aware of this and constantly wary. no need to be wary at all. enable 2 factor authentication and eliminate the risk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-12 17:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703121729200.92604@mako.ath.cx> |
| In reply to | #102229 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, 12 March 2017 13:51 -0500, in article <120320171351537547%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, nospam wrote: > In article <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703121243590.92604@mako.ath.cx>, David > Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> wrote: >>> I recently got a couple of emails from Apple titled "Your Apple ID >>> was used to sign in to FaceTime on an iPhone 5: and "Your Apple ID >>> was used to sign in to iCloud on an iPhone 6". >> As others have pointed out, this was a phish, attempting to >> convince you to provide your Apple ID credentials. Apple ID >> phishing has jumped substantially over the last couple of months. >> It's worth being aware of this and constantly wary. > no need to be wary at all. > enable 2 factor authentication and eliminate the risk. And all along, I thought using two factor authentication was being wary. - -- David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> Be kind to animals; kiss a shark. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAljFzA4ACgkQUrwpmRoS3utpKQCdHtzDMArcL7AO5cMSjNblsLua HHAAoMxZZ8ZfE2H3ffO+TYqVXPbyhz+T =Yr9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-12 18:33 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <120320171833342965%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #102237 |
In article <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703121729200.92604@mako.ath.cx>, David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> wrote: > >>> I recently got a couple of emails from Apple titled "Your Apple ID > >>> was used to sign in to FaceTime on an iPhone 5: and "Your Apple ID > >>> was used to sign in to iCloud on an iPhone 6". > > >> As others have pointed out, this was a phish, attempting to > >> convince you to provide your Apple ID credentials. Apple ID > >> phishing has jumped substantially over the last couple of months. > >> It's worth being aware of this and constantly wary. > > > no need to be wary at all. > > > enable 2 factor authentication and eliminate the risk. > > And all along, I thought using two factor authentication was being > wary. it isn't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-13 16:38 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <do_ray_me-BDDB17.16383013032017@46.sub-75-242-165.myvzw.com> |
| In reply to | #102238 |
In article <120320171833342965%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703121729200.92604@mako.ath.cx>, David > Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> wrote: > ... > > > no need to be wary at all. > > > > > enable 2 factor authentication and eliminate the risk. > > > > And all along, I thought using two factor authentication was being > > wary. > > it isn't. Even worse than being plain wrong is your pissing competition instincts harnessed to your complete lack of humour. -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-12 22:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <oa4j1r$5qf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #102229 |
In article <120320171351537547%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >enable 2 factor authentication and eliminate the risk. A few minutes ago, I began a login iCloud on my MacBook. Same computer, same web browser as always, yet for some reason TFA got triggered. My iPhone beeped to let me know about the code I needed. A moment later, the required six-digit code for my MacBook appeared on another device-- my MacBook. I typed it in and got logged in to iCloud. Never had to reach for the iPhone on the table. Clearly, this is not how things are supposed to work. Either Apple's security system knew that Firefox on this computer was trusted, and therefore shouldn't have demanded a verification code, or if it really thought that this system wasn't trusted, then it shouldn't have sent a verification code to it. It's as though one security database isn't talking to another one. Patty
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-12 18:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <oa4jg2$a0i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #102239 |
On 2017-03-12 22:45:16 +0000, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> said: > Either Apple's security system knew that Firefox on this computer was > trusted, and therefore shouldn't have demanded a verification code, or > if it really thought that this system wasn't trusted, then it shouldn't > have sent a verification code to it. Firefox on your system is not the same as your system. It is also not clear how that message got sent to your MacBook - was it a forwarded text message? (that would imply you are using two-step authentication rather than two-factor - see: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204152 ) A.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-13 00:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <oa4poa$sbd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #102240 |
In article <oa4jg2$a0i$1@dont-email.me>, Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2017-03-12 22:45:16 +0000, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> said: > >> Either Apple's security system knew that Firefox on this computer was >> trusted, and therefore shouldn't have demanded a verification code, or >> if it really thought that this system wasn't trusted, then it shouldn't >> have sent a verification code to it. > >Firefox on your system is not the same as your system. TFA verifies specific browsers that you use on a given computer: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204915 "When you sign in on the web, you can choose to trust your browser, so you won't be asked for a verification code the next time you sign in from that computer." >It is also not clear how that message got sent to your MacBook - was it >a forwarded text message? No, the code just appeared on the computer's screen, over the boxes where the code numbers were supposed to be entered. I memorized the numbers, clicked to close that little window, then entered the numbers into the boxes in the other little window. :-) Patty
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-12 21:03 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <oa4qv8$1t7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #102241 |
On 2017-03-13 00:39:38 +0000, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> said: > In article <oa4jg2$a0i$1@dont-email.me>, Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2017-03-12 22:45:16 +0000, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> said: >> >>> Either Apple's security system knew that Firefox on this computer was >>> trusted, and therefore shouldn't have demanded a verification code, or >>> if it really thought that this system wasn't trusted, then it shouldn't >>> have sent a verification code to it. >> >> Firefox on your system is not the same as your system. > > TFA verifies specific browsers that you use on a given computer: You wanted to authorize a copy of Firefox to talk to iCloud. Two factor authentication means you need two things to authentic. In this case, in order to authorize Firefox, you needed to know something (your Apple-ID password) and you needed to have something (a trusted device: your MacBook, or your iPhone). The fact that the copy of Firefox which you wanted to authenticate happened to be running on your MacBook is not relevant. Nor should Apple have made any assumptions about whether you wanted to trust it or not. A.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-13 01:28 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <oa4skb$5b4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #102242 |
In article <oa4qv8$1t7$1@dont-email.me>, Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> wrote: > >You wanted to authorize a copy of Firefox to talk to iCloud. > >Two factor authentication means you need two things to authentic. In >this case, in order to authorize Firefox, you needed to know something >(your Apple-ID password) and you needed to have something (a trusted >device: your MacBook, or your iPhone). So the computer was trusted but the browser wasn't? How could the computer be trusted when the only way I've ever signed on to iCloud from it was via the browser? And why wouldn't Firefox be trusted when I've been using it to access the Web (including iCloud) since I bought this computer couple of years ago? Patty
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-13 00:39 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <oa57k6$n4v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #102243 |
On 2017-03-13 01:28:43 +0000, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> said: > How could the computer be trusted when the only way I've ever signed on > to iCloud from it was via the browser? I do not think this is possible. Are you saying you have never signed into iCloud in System Preferences on this device? A.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-13 17:37 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fake Email !From Apple |
| Message-ID | <oa6lch$6sg$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #102250 |
In article <oa57k6$n4v$1@dont-email.me>, Alrescha <alrescha@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2017-03-13 01:28:43 +0000, Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> said: > >> How could the computer be trusted when the only way I've ever signed on >> to iCloud from it was via the browser? > >I do not think this is possible. Are you saying you have never signed >into iCloud in System Preferences on this device? I didn't even know that was possible. I consider iCloud to be a website and had never looked for any other way to log in to it than by going to icloud.com with a web browser. I think maybe there's an option to sign in to iCloud when one sets up a Mac for the first time, so I may (or may not) have done that when I upgraded this MacBook to Sierra several months ago. Maybe that cookie is persistent but browser verifications aren't? Patty
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web