Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #102127 > unrolled thread
| Started by | michaelunowho@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-09 14:35 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-03-14 14:35 -0700 |
| Articles | 7 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
2013 Mac Pro...never upgraded. michaelunowho@gmail.com - 2017-03-09 14:35 -0800
Re: 2013 Mac Pro...never upgraded. Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2017-03-10 20:28 +0000
Re: 2013 Mac Pro...never upgraded. JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-03-10 19:54 -0500
Re: 2013 Mac Pro...never upgraded. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-10 19:59 -0500
Re: 2013 Mac Pro...never upgraded. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2017-03-11 03:16 +0000
Re: 2013 Mac Pro...never upgraded. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-03-11 11:01 +0000
Re: 2013 Mac Pro...never upgraded. michaelunowho@gmail.com - 2017-03-14 14:35 -0700
| From | michaelunowho@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-09 14:35 -0800 |
| Subject | 2013 Mac Pro...never upgraded. |
| Message-ID | <1a8e8c25-9cbb-4b75-84c2-1720f8b66ab1@googlegroups.com> |
Same POS today, that it was in 2013... with ZERO upgrades.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-10 20:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o9v29a$1f74$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #102127 |
On 09/03/2017 22:35, michaelunowho@gmail.com wrote: > Same POS today, that it was in 2013... with ZERO upgrades. Still faster than any other PC I've used since, though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-10 19:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58c34ac2$0$34523$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #102163 |
On 2017-03-10 15:28, Calum wrote: > On 09/03/2017 22:35, michaelunowho@gmail.com wrote: >> Same POS today, that it was in 2013... with ZERO upgrades Intel has not had significant enough upgrades to warrant upgrading that Mac pro model. When I bought mine in June 2016, Intel documents shill showed that chip to be "current" as of the end of 2015 (despite being a few years old already). Could Apple have done minor speed boost ? very likely.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-10 19:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <100320171959045264%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #102179 |
In article <58c34ac2$0$34523$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > >> Same POS today, that it was in 2013... with ZERO upgrades > > Intel has not had significant enough upgrades to warrant upgrading that > Mac pro model. When I bought mine in June 2016, Intel documents shill > showed that chip to be "current" as of the end of 2015 (despite being a > few years old already). yep. most of the delays are due to intel. > Could Apple have done minor speed boost ? very likely. and then people would bitch that it was only a minor speed boost.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-11 03:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <eih8giFjvhsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #102179 |
JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 2017-03-10 15:28, Calum wrote: >> On 09/03/2017 22:35, michaelunowho@gmail.com wrote: >>> Same POS today, that it was in 2013... with ZERO upgrades > > Intel has not had significant enough upgrades to warrant upgrading that > Mac pro model. When I bought mine in June 2016, Intel documents shill > showed that chip to be "current" as of the end of 2015 (despite being a > few years old already). Graphics cards have gotten faster though. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-11 11:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnoc7mea.376.g.kreme@snow.local> |
| In reply to | #102179 |
In message <58c34ac2$0$34523$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > On 2017-03-10 15:28, Calum wrote: >> On 09/03/2017 22:35, michaelunowho@gmail.com wrote: >>> Same POS today, that it was in 2013... with ZERO upgrades > Intel has not had significant enough upgrades to warrant upgrading that > Mac pro model. When I bought mine in June 2016, Intel documents shill > showed that chip to be "current" as of the end of 2015 (despite being a > few years old already). > Could Apple have done minor speed boost ? very likely. What Apple could have done (should have done) is upgrade the GPUs and offer a choice of different GPUs. While the Xeon chips in the MacPro are still excellent, the GPUs are simply old at this point. -- Satan oscillate my metallic sonatas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | michaelunowho@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 14:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d95f7bf0-1c10-40fa-9048-3e0a21ae1b86@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #102163 |
On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 3:28:30 PM UTC-5, Calum wrote: > On 09/03/2017 22:35, michaelunowho@gmail.com wrote: > > Same POS today, that it was in 2013... with ZERO upgrades. > > Still faster than any other PC I've used since, though. BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web