Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #94897 > unrolled thread

iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed?

Started bygtr <xxx@yyy.zzz>
First post2016-09-28 17:19 -0700
Last post2016-09-30 18:16 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 78 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

Contents

  iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2016-09-28 17:19 -0700
    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2016-09-29 13:28 +1300
      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2016-09-28 17:48 -0700
      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2016-09-29 21:15 -0400
        Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 01:35 +0000
        Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-29 21:40 -0400
          Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? android <here@there.was> - 2016-09-30 05:38 +0200
            Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-29 21:03 -0700
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 00:07 -0400
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-29 21:16 -0700
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 08:33 -0400
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 18:04 +0000
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? android <here@there.was> - 2016-09-30 06:47 +0200
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-09-30 12:01 -0500
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 18:03 +0000
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-30 11:32 -0700
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 14:51 -0400
                    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-30 11:52 -0700
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 19:28 +0000
                    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-30 13:14 -0700
                      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 16:48 -0400
                        Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-30 13:52 -0700
                        Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 21:14 +0000
                          Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:22 -0400
                      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-01 03:57 +0000
            Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-09-30 12:00 -0500
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello) - 2016-10-01 15:46 -0600
        Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-09-30 00:58 -0400
          Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-29 22:13 -0700
            Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? android <here@there.was> - 2016-09-30 07:22 +0200
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-09-30 01:38 -0400
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-29 23:22 -0700
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? android <here@there.was> - 2016-09-30 09:51 +0200
                    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 18:15 +0000
                      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-30 11:44 -0700
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 18:14 +0000
                    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-30 11:42 -0700
                      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 19:30 +0000
                      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-01 03:46 -0400
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-29 23:19 -0700
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 18:15 +0000
          Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 18:11 +0000
            Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-01 03:44 -0400
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-01 12:33 -0400
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2016-10-02 15:36 +1300
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-10-01 22:36 -0500
                    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2016-10-02 18:21 +1300
                      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-02 03:43 -0400
                        Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-10-02 01:00 -0700
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2016-10-01 09:35 -0700
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-10-01 17:39 +0000
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-10-01 17:10 -0400
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-10-01 19:00 -0500
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-10-01 23:21 -0700
    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-28 17:31 -0700
    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-09-28 21:13 -0400
      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2016-09-29 11:02 -0700
    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-09-29 04:31 +0000
    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-09-29 16:53 -0500
      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-29 17:56 -0400
      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-29 22:03 +0000
        Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-09-29 21:53 -0500
          Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-29 23:12 -0400
          Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-29 20:52 -0700
            Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-09-30 12:04 -0500
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 13:11 -0400
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? John Albert <j.albert@snet.net> - 2016-09-30 22:56 -0400
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-30 23:03 -0400
                    Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2016-09-30 23:51 -0700
                      Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-01 12:33 -0400
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-01 04:10 +0000
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 18:18 +0000
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2016-09-30 11:44 -0700
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 19:31 +0000
              Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-10-01 04:02 +0000
                Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-10-01 19:07 -0500
                  Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-01 20:14 -0400
          Re: iPhoto - Mothballed or Trashed? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-09-30 18:16 +0000

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#95005

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-09-30 16:48 -0400
Message-ID<300920161648399941%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#95003
In article <2016093013140263575-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> >>>> You can do that in Image Capture, and there is a check box in Photos so
> >>>> that a USB connected device, Phone, camera, or SD/CF card is not used.
> >>>> However, with SD/CF cards if they are fresh, or reformated, Photos
> >>>> treats them as if they are a new, previously unconnected device, and
> >>>> Photos will open/autolaunch. Then you have to go through the PIA
> >>>> uncheck procedure all over again.
> >>> 
> >>> And that has *nothing* to do with Photos. It's a macOS feature.
> >> 
> >> Then it is a crappy unwelcome feature.
> > 
> > I think it's a *good* feature that I can tell the OS what to do when I
> > mount an SD card, and that I only have to do that *once* for each card I
> > use. I suppose it might be nice to be able to tell it to do it for *any*
> > card; but since I don't use many cards, that's not a big deal to me.
> > When I insert a new card, I can easily tell it what to do then.
> 
> However, some folks actually reformat SD & CF cards in a camera, then 
> you have to jump through the annoying hoops again as your indispensible 
> feature sees the SD/CF card, with a fresh DCIM folder as a new camera.

some folks make more trouble for themselves for no reason.

deleting all photos rather than reformatting avoids that issue entirely.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#95006

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2016-09-30 13:52 -0700
Message-ID<201609301352445947-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#95005
On 2016-09-30 20:48:39 +0000, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> said:

> In article <2016093013140263575-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> You can do that in Image Capture, and there is a check box in Photos so
>>>>>> that a USB connected device, Phone, camera, or SD/CF card is not used.
>>>>>> However, with SD/CF cards if they are fresh, or reformated, Photos
>>>>>> treats them as if they are a new, previously unconnected device, and
>>>>>> Photos will open/autolaunch. Then you have to go through the PIA
>>>>>> uncheck procedure all over again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And that has *nothing* to do with Photos. It's a macOS feature.
>>>> 
>>>> Then it is a crappy unwelcome feature.
>>> 
>>> I think it's a *good* feature that I can tell the OS what to do when I
>>> mount an SD card, and that I only have to do that *once* for each card I
>>> use. I suppose it might be nice to be able to tell it to do it for *any*
>>> card; but since I don't use many cards, that's not a big deal to me.
>>> When I insert a new card, I can easily tell it what to do then.
>> 
>> However, some folks actually reformat SD & CF cards in a camera, then
>> you have to jump through the annoying hoops again as your indispensible
>> feature sees the SD/CF card, with a fresh DCIM folder as a new camera.
> 
> some folks make more trouble for themselves for no reason.
> 
> deleting all photos rather than reformatting avoids that issue entirely.

Different strokes.

-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#95008

FromJolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Date2016-09-30 21:14 +0000
Message-ID<e582tkFbrb4U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#95005
On 2016-09-30, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> In article <2016093013140263575-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>
>> However, some folks actually reformat SD & CF cards in a camera, then 
>> you have to jump through the annoying hoops again as your indispensible 
>> feature sees the SD/CF card, with a fresh DCIM folder as a new camera.
>
> some folks make more trouble for themselves for no reason.
>
> deleting all photos rather than reformatting avoids that issue entirely.

Agreed. I'm not sure why I would bother reformatting the entire card
when I can just delete the photos from it. It's often simpler to delete
photos than it is to reformat the card. When I enter the camera menu
system on my d90, I'm already at the Playback menu, and can just arrow
to Delete (if it's not already selected since it's at the top of the
list) and delete all or some of the images. I'd have to exit out of that
and go to the Settings menu to reformat the card. I'm almost never in
the Setting menu. So it's more trouble; and if it caused my computer to
nag me each time I did it, I'd definitely entertain the idea of deleting
the photos some other way. : )

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#95010

Fromnospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-09-30 17:22 -0400
Message-ID<300920161722352075%nospam@nospam.invalid>
In reply to#95008
In article <e582tkFbrb4U1@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger
<jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

> >> However, some folks actually reformat SD & CF cards in a camera, then 
> >> you have to jump through the annoying hoops again as your indispensible 
> >> feature sees the SD/CF card, with a fresh DCIM folder as a new camera.
> >
> > some folks make more trouble for themselves for no reason.
> >
> > deleting all photos rather than reformatting avoids that issue entirely.
> 
> Agreed. I'm not sure why I would bother reformatting the entire card
> when I can just delete the photos from it. It's often simpler to delete
> photos than it is to reformat the card. When I enter the camera menu
> system on my d90, I'm already at the Playback menu, and can just arrow
> to Delete (if it's not already selected since it's at the top of the
> list) and delete all or some of the images. I'd have to exit out of that
> and go to the Settings menu to reformat the card. I'm almost never in
> the Setting menu. So it's more trouble; and if it caused my computer to
> nag me each time I did it, I'd definitely entertain the idea of deleting
> the photos some other way. : )

yep. 

this very issue was debated in rec.photo.digital a year or two ago.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#95017

FromLewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Date2016-10-01 03:57 +0000
Message-ID<slrnnuud25.1r6.g.kreme@snow.local>
In reply to#95003
In message <2016093013140263575-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> 
  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2016-09-30 19:28:44 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said:

>> On 2016-09-30, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>> On 2016-09-30 18:03:08 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said:
>>>> On 2016-09-30, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can do that in Image Capture, and there is a check box in Photos so
>>>>> that a USB connected device, Phone, camera, or SD/CF card is not used.
>>>>> However, with SD/CF cards if they are fresh, or reformated, Photos
>>>>> treats them as if they are a new, previously unconnected device, and
>>>>> Photos will open/autolaunch. Then you have to go through the PIA
>>>>> uncheck procedure all over again.
>>>> 
>>>> And that has *nothing* to do with Photos. It's a macOS feature.
>>> 
>>> Then it is a crappy unwelcome feature.
>> 
>> I think it's a *good* feature that I can tell the OS what to do when I
>> mount an SD card, and that I only have to do that *once* for each card I
>> use. I suppose it might be nice to be able to tell it to do it for *any*
>> card; but since I don't use many cards, that's not a big deal to me.
>> When I insert a new card, I can easily tell it what to do then.

> However, some folks actually reformat SD & CF cards in a camera,

But there is absolutely no reason to do this. None. Ever.

> then you have to jump through the annoying hoops again as your
> indispensible feature sees the SD/CF card, with a fresh DCIM folder as
> a new camera.

"Doctor, it hurts when I intentionally hit my hand with a hammer."


>> So it's not "without doubt one of the most unwelcome, annoying apps
>> Apple has ever foisted on users".

> OK! This user, and several thousand others.

Out of 100,000,000+?

-- 
C is for CLARA who wasted away
D is for DESMOND thrown out of a sleigh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94974

From"Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid>
Date2016-09-30 12:00 -0500
Message-ID<nsm5nh$24l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#94956
On 09-29-2016 22:38, android wrote:
> Just plug a card with CR2s in the reader and open it and there should be
> a dropdown or something that let's you pick your poisson...

But if it's poisson fumés, hold your breath while eating it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#95040

Fromnmassello@yahoo.com (Neill Massello)
Date2016-10-01 15:46 -0600
Message-ID<1mug4at.jfpwwm12nz03N%nmassello@yahoo.com>
In reply to#94974
Happy.Hobo <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> wrote:

> But if it's poisson fumés, hold your breath while eating it.

Can I use Tatar sauce?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94963

FromJF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca>
Date2016-09-30 00:58 -0400
Message-ID<57edf104$0$53459$c3e8da3$b1356c67@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#94949
On 2016-09-29 21:15, Davoud wrote:

> Yes, damn them! I don't need Photos, don't like it, don't want it. It
> annoys me greatly when it launches each time I insert a camera card to
> import into Lightroom. I would love to be able to delete "Photos."

I have a "Default Apps" extension in my System Preferences which lists
which app gets launched for what type of file/media/content type etc.

You can go through it and spot every instance where "Photos" is lauched
and either deleted it or replace it with Lightroom

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94964

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2016-09-29 22:13 -0700
Message-ID<201609292213103120-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#94963
On 2016-09-30 04:58:44 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:

> On 2016-09-29 21:15, Davoud wrote:
> 
>> Yes, damn them! I don't need Photos, don't like it, don't want it. It
>> annoys me greatly when it launches each time I insert a camera card to
>> import into Lightroom. I would love to be able to delete "Photos."
> 
> I have a "Default Apps" extension in my System Preferences which lists
> which app gets launched for what type of file/media/content type etc.

How does one obtain this "Default Apps" extension?

> You can go through it and spot every instance where "Photos" is lauched
> and either deleted it or replace it with Lightroom


-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94965

Fromandroid <here@there.was>
Date2016-09-30 07:22 +0200
Message-ID<here-20BD23.07221730092016@news.individual.net>
In reply to#94964
In article <201609292213103120-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
 Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> On 2016-09-30 04:58:44 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:
> 
> > On 2016-09-29 21:15, Davoud wrote:
> > 
> >> Yes, damn them! I don't need Photos, don't like it, don't want it. It
> >> annoys me greatly when it launches each time I insert a camera card to
> >> import into Lightroom. I would love to be able to delete "Photos."
> > 
> > I have a "Default Apps" extension in my System Preferences which lists
> > which app gets launched for what type of file/media/content type etc.
> 
> How does one obtain this "Default Apps" extension?

Is this it?

<http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>
> 
> > You can go through it and spot every instance where "Photos" is lauched
> > and either deleted it or replace it with Lightroom
-- 
teleportation kills

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94966

FromJF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca>
Date2016-09-30 01:38 -0400
Message-ID<57edfa62$0$29140$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#94965
On 2016-09-30 01:22, android wrote:

> Is this it?
> 
> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>

Yep. That looks like it. Once installed, I just see "Default Apps" so it
wasn't obvious where I ad gotten it from.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94968

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2016-09-29 23:22 -0700
Message-ID<201609292322321299-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#94966
On 2016-09-30 05:38:41 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:

> On 2016-09-30 01:22, android wrote:
> 
>> Is this it?
>> 
>> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>
> 
> Yep. That looks like it. Once installed, I just see "Default Apps" so it
> wasn't obvious where I ad gotten it from.

The only problem is, it is so old (last update was for OSX 10.4) it 
doesn't even understand that "Photos" exists.
-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94971

Fromandroid <here@there.was>
Date2016-09-30 09:51 +0200
Message-ID<here-82ACA1.09512330092016@news.individual.net>
In reply to#94968
In article <201609292322321299-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
 Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> On 2016-09-30 05:38:41 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:
> 
> > On 2016-09-30 01:22, android wrote:
> > 
> >> Is this it?
> >> 
> >> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>
> > 
> > Yep. That looks like it. Once installed, I just see "Default Apps" so it
> > wasn't obvious where I ad gotten it from.
> 
> The only problem is, it is so old (last update was for OSX 10.4) it 
> doesn't even understand that "Photos" exists.

Have you tried?
-- 
teleportation kills

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94986

FromJolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Date2016-09-30 18:15 +0000
Message-ID<e57oehF993vU7@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#94971
On 2016-09-30, android <here@there.was> wrote:
> In article <201609292322321299-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-09-30 05:38:41 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:
>> 
>> > On 2016-09-30 01:22, android wrote:
>> > 
>> >> Is this it?
>> >> 
>> >> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>
>> > 
>> > Yep. That looks like it. Once installed, I just see "Default Apps" so it
>> > wasn't obvious where I ad gotten it from.
>> 
>> The only problem is, it is so old (last update was for OSX 10.4) it 
>> doesn't even understand that "Photos" exists.
>
> Have you tried?

Obviously not.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94991

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2016-09-30 11:44 -0700
Message-ID<2016093011441261420-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#94986
On 2016-09-30 18:15:46 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said:

> On 2016-09-30, android <here@there.was> wrote:
>> In article <201609292322321299-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>> Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2016-09-30 05:38:41 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:
>>> 
>>>> On 2016-09-30 01:22, android wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Is this it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>
>>>> 
>>>> Yep. That looks like it. Once installed, I just see "Default Apps" so it
>>>> wasn't obvious where I ad gotten it from.
>>> 
>>> The only problem is, it is so old (last update was for OSX 10.4) it
>>> doesn't even understand that "Photos" exists.
>> 
>> Have you tried?
> 
> Obviously not.

Not then, but I had by the time you started your counter rant to my rant.
-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94984

FromJolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Date2016-09-30 18:14 +0000
Message-ID<e57od1F993vU5@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#94968
On 2016-09-30, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2016-09-30 05:38:41 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:
>
>> On 2016-09-30 01:22, android wrote:
>> 
>>> Is this it?
>>> 
>>> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>
>> 
>> Yep. That looks like it. Once installed, I just see "Default Apps" so it
>> wasn't obvious where I ad gotten it from.
>
> The only problem is, it is so old (last update was for OSX 10.4) it 
> doesn't even understand that "Photos" exists.

Wrong:

<https://i.imgur.com/8xN2ywe.png>

What I don't see, though, is a way to control what happens when an SD
card is mounted. I suspect JF Mezei is making suggestions again without
knowing whether they will actually work (typical for him,
unfortunately). I'd be perfectly happy if he showed us how to control it
with RCDefaultApp, though. I just won't be holding my breath while we
wait. : )

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94990

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2016-09-30 11:42 -0700
Message-ID<2016093011425885652-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#94984
On 2016-09-30 18:14:57 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said:

> On 2016-09-30, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>> On 2016-09-30 05:38:41 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:
>> 
>>> On 2016-09-30 01:22, android wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Is this it?
>>>> 
>>>> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>
>>> 
>>> Yep. That looks like it. Once installed, I just see "Default Apps" so it
>>> wasn't obvious where I ad gotten it from.
>> 
>> The only problem is, it is so old (last update was for OSX 10.4) it
>> doesn't even understand that "Photos" exists.
> 
> Wrong:
> 
> <https://i.imgur.com/8xN2ywe.png>

Oh well.
> 
> What I don't see, though, is a way to control what happens when an SD
> card is mounted. I suspect JF Mezei is making suggestions again without
> knowing whether they will actually work (typical for him,
> unfortunately). I'd be perfectly happy if he showed us how to control it
> with RCDefaultApp, though. I just won't be holding my breath while we
> wait. : )

It does mention "Camera" under "Media" and there it doesn't mention 
Photos, just iPhoto and ImageCapture with a greyed out "no entry" icon 
over them, the "other" option does not accept Lightroom. So the only 
logical action to use is "Ignore". That makes sense as Photos 
recognizes SD/CF cards as cameras.
<https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_275.jpg>

-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94998

FromJolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Date2016-09-30 19:30 +0000
Message-ID<e57sqmF993vU12@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#94990
On 2016-09-30, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2016-09-30 18:14:57 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said:
>
>> On 2016-09-30, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>> On 2016-09-30 05:38:41 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:
>>> 
>>>> On 2016-09-30 01:22, android wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Is this it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>
>>>> 
>>>> Yep. That looks like it. Once installed, I just see "Default Apps" so it
>>>> wasn't obvious where I ad gotten it from.
>>> 
>>> The only problem is, it is so old (last update was for OSX 10.4) it
>>> doesn't even understand that "Photos" exists.
>> 
>> Wrong:
>> 
>> <https://i.imgur.com/8xN2ywe.png>
>
> Oh well.
> 
>> What I don't see, though, is a way to control what happens when an SD
>> card is mounted. I suspect JF Mezei is making suggestions again without
>> knowing whether they will actually work (typical for him,
>> unfortunately). I'd be perfectly happy if he showed us how to control it
>> with RCDefaultApp, though. I just won't be holding my breath while we
>> wait. : )
>
> It does mention "Camera" under "Media" and there it doesn't mention 
> Photos, just iPhoto and ImageCapture with a greyed out "no entry" icon 
> over them, the "other" option does not accept Lightroom.

It does accept Photos.

> So the only logical action to use is "Ignore". That makes sense as
> Photos recognizes SD/CF cards as cameras.
><https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_275.jpg>

Well there you go then. : )

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#95024

FromJF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca>
Date2016-10-01 03:46 -0400
Message-ID<57ef69f3$0$10207$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#94990
On 2016-09-30 14:42, Savageduck wrote:

> It does mention "Camera" under "Media" and there it doesn't mention 
> Photos, just iPhoto and ImageCapture with a greyed out "no entry" icon 

For me, I have

iPhoto.app
Other... (which lets you choose any app)
Ignore
<default>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#94967

FromSavageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Date2016-09-29 23:19 -0700
Message-ID<2016092923191477876-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
In reply to#94965
On 2016-09-30 05:22:17 +0000, android <here@there.was> said:

> In article <201609292213103120-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-09-30 04:58:44 +0000, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> said:
>> 
>>> On 2016-09-29 21:15, Davoud wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, damn them! I don't need Photos, don't like it, don't want it. It
>>>> annoys me greatly when it launches each time I insert a camera card to
>>>> import into Lightroom. I would love to be able to delete "Photos."
>>> 
>>> I have a "Default Apps" extension in my System Preferences which lists
>>> which app gets launched for what type of file/media/content type etc.
>> 
>> How does one obtain this "Default Apps" extension?
> 
> Is this it?
> 
> <http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/>

What is interesting is, the developer doesn't seem to have touched in 
over 7 years.
Hmm...

>> 
>>> You can go through it and spot every instance where "Photos" is lauched
>>> and either deleted it or replace it with Lightroom


-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web