Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #87280 > unrolled thread

Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201601.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-01-20 15:33 +0100
    Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2016-01-20 14:22 -0500
      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-20 20:02 +0000
        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-20 15:04 -0500
          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-20 20:23 +0000
        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day android <here@there.was> - 2016-01-20 21:15 +0100
        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2016-01-20 19:52 -0500
          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-21 01:56 +0000
            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-01-20 22:24 -0500
              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-21 03:49 +0000
                Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-01-20 23:07 -0500
                  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-21 04:16 +0000
                    Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-21 04:45 +0000
                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2016-01-21 04:52 +0000
                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-01-21 11:43 -0500
                    Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-21 01:17 -0500
                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-01-21 08:57 -0500
                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-21 09:59 -0500
                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-01-21 10:22 -0500
                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-21 14:30 -0500
                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-01-21 11:42 -0800
                              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-21 14:50 -0500
                              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-01-21 20:28 +0000
                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-21 11:33 -0500
                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-01-21 12:05 -0500
                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-21 11:35 -0500
                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-01-21 11:41 -0800
                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-21 22:19 +0000
                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-01-21 11:46 -0500
                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-21 14:30 -0500
                  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2016-01-20 23:38 -0500
                  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-01-21 08:52 -0500
                    Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Happy.Hobo" <Happy.Hobo@Spam.Invalid> - 2016-01-21 11:48 -0500
                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-21 14:30 -0500
                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-21 21:49 +0000
                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-21 16:50 -0500
                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-21 22:18 +0000
                  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-21 21:48 +0000
                    Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-02-21 19:09 -0500
                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-22 00:18 +0000
                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-02-21 20:08 -0500
                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-21 20:09 -0500
                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-02-21 20:34 -0500
                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-02-22 13:06 +0000
                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-22 17:34 +0000
            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-21 01:08 -0500
          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Ed Mullen <ejEMOVER@edmullen.net> - 2016-01-20 22:08 -0500
            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-21 09:45 -0500
            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-21 13:36 -0200
              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-01-21 11:31 -0500
              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-21 11:39 -0500
          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2016-01-21 02:37 -0800
          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-01-27 06:43 -0500
            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-27 07:26 -0500
            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2016-01-27 13:15 +0000
              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-01-27 11:27 -0500
              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-27 16:41 +0000
                Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-27 17:01 +0000
                  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-27 17:23 +0000
                    Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-27 17:58 +0000
                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-27 18:22 +0000
                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-27 18:44 +0000
                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-27 19:21 +0000
                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-27 20:06 +0000
                              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-28 03:17 +0000
                                Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-28 08:25 +0000
                                  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-28 10:42 +0000
                                    Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-28 16:33 +0000
                                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-28 16:55 +0000
                                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2016-01-29 18:47 -0800
                                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-30 03:28 +0000
                                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2016-01-31 12:03 -0800
                                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-31 21:27 +0000
                                              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2016-02-01 07:01 -0800
                                                Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-02-01 17:16 +0000
                                                  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2016-02-02 17:05 -0800
                                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-31 23:02 +0000
                                              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-02-01 02:04 +0000
                                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-31 01:02 +0000
                                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-01-31 04:35 +0000
                                      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Jake" <jakethesnake@aol.com> - 2016-02-20 17:47 -0500
                                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2016-02-21 00:06 +0000
                                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2016-02-20 19:48 -0800
                                  Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2016-01-31 03:59 +0000
                        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-26 19:42 +0000
                          Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-02-26 17:17 -0300
                            Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-26 20:22 +0000
                              Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-02-26 20:15 -0300
                                Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-26 23:27 +0000
        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-02-21 21:45 +0000
      Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-01-27 06:28 -0500
        Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-27 06:40 -0500

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

#87910

Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 27/01/2016 17:23, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 27/01/2016 16:41, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>>>>> In message <68KdnV-lOs7MMDXLnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@supernews.com>
>>>>> Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Davoud <star@sky.net> writes:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A lot of people? Linux has a steady lock on about 1.5% of OS usage,
>>>>>>> with the majority of that in server applications. As a desktop
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I guess you forgot all of the embedded applications and the mobile
>>>>>> devices that use Linux. They far outnumber desktop usage of any OS.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Oh, are you one of those "Android is Linux" morons?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Android is not linux. Android is Java.
>>>> 
>>>> Sounds similar to dimwits who proclaim Android is WINNING the smartphone
>>>> "wars" because Android is used on so many phones while ignore the fact that
>>>> most of those Android phones are actually feature phones rather than smart
>>>> phones. ; )
>>>> 
>>> smartphone - definition of smartphone
>> 
>> We all know what smart phones are, silly.
>> 
> Just checking ;-)

The fact is Android is used on many feature phones and those are typically
included in Android smartphone market share figures despite the fact that
they are not really smartphones..

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#87914

On 27/01/2016 18:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
> Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 27/01/2016 17:23, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On 27/01/2016 16:41, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>> Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>>>>>> In message <68KdnV-lOs7MMDXLnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@supernews.com>
>>>>>> Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Davoud <star@sky.net> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A lot of people? Linux has a steady lock on about 1.5% of OS usage,
>>>>>>>> with the majority of that in server applications. As a desktop
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess you forgot all of the embedded applications and the mobile
>>>>>>> devices that use Linux. They far outnumber desktop usage of any OS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, are you one of those "Android is Linux" morons?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Android is not linux. Android is Java.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds similar to dimwits who proclaim Android is WINNING the smartphone
>>>>> "wars" because Android is used on so many phones while ignore the fact that
>>>>> most of those Android phones are actually feature phones rather than smart
>>>>> phones. ; )
>>>>>
>>>> smartphone - definition of smartphone
>>>
>>> We all know what smart phones are, silly.
>>>
>> Just checking ;-)
>
> The fact is Android is used on many feature phones and those are typically
> included in Android smartphone market share figures despite the fact that
> they are not really smartphones..
>
Mine seems pretty smart to me :-)

-- 
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#87916

On 2016-01-27, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 27/01/2016 18:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>
>> The fact is Android is used on many feature phones and those are typically
>> included in Android smartphone market share figures despite the fact that
>> they are not really smartphones..
>>
> Mine seems pretty smart to me :-)

Your what? What make and model phone do you have?

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#87932

On 27/01/2016 19:21, Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2016-01-27, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 27/01/2016 18:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>
>>> The fact is Android is used on many feature phones and those are typically
>>> included in Android smartphone market share figures despite the fact that
>>> they are not really smartphones..
>>>
>> Mine seems pretty smart to me :-)
>
> Your what? What make and model phone do you have?
>
Oppo Find 7
http://www.gsmarena.com/oppo_find_7-6214.php

-- 
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#87996

Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 27/01/2016 19:21, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2016-01-27, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 27/01/2016 18:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The fact is Android is used on many feature phones and those are typically
>>>> included in Android smartphone market share figures despite the fact that
>>>> they are not really smartphones..
>>>> 
>>> Mine seems pretty smart to me :-)
>> 
>> Your what? What make and model phone do you have?
>> 
> Oppo Find 7
> http://www.gsmarena.com/oppo_find_7-6214.php

That's not an Android feature phone. Do you know the difference?

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88018

On 28/01/2016 03:17, Jolly Roger wrote:
> Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 27/01/2016 19:21, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-27, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On 27/01/2016 18:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact is Android is used on many feature phones and those are typically
>>>>> included in Android smartphone market share figures despite the fact that
>>>>> they are not really smartphones..
>>>>>
>>>> Mine seems pretty smart to me :-)
>>>
>>> Your what? What make and model phone do you have?
>>>
>> Oppo Find 7
>> http://www.gsmarena.com/oppo_find_7-6214.php
>
> That's not an Android feature phone. Do you know the difference?
>
Then explain the difference to me. I can open apps with gestures etc.
I class most modern mobile phones these days as smart.
I've never heard of a mobile phone being advertised as a feature phone.
-- 
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88019

On 28/01/2016 08:25, Bod wrote:
> On 28/01/2016 03:17, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 27/01/2016 19:21, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-27, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> On 27/01/2016 18:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact is Android is used on many feature phones and those are
>>>>>> typically
>>>>>> included in Android smartphone market share figures despite the
>>>>>> fact that
>>>>>> they are not really smartphones..
>>>>>>
>>>>> Mine seems pretty smart to me :-)
>>>>
>>>> Your what? What make and model phone do you have?
>>>>
>>> Oppo Find 7
>>> http://www.gsmarena.com/oppo_find_7-6214.php
>>
>> That's not an Android feature phone. Do you know the difference?
>>
> Then explain the difference to me. I can open apps with gestures etc.
> I class most modern mobile phones these days as smart.
> I've never heard of a mobile phone being advertised as a feature phone.
 >
Just checked and found this:

*Feature phone*
noun
plural noun: feature phones
a mobile phone that incorporates features such as the ability to access 
the Internet and store and play music but lacks the advanced 
functionality of a smartphone.

And this from Wikipedia:

"Although a feature phone is a low-end device and a smartphone a 
high-end one, there is no standard way of distinguishing them.[24][25] 
Smartphone and feature phone are not mutually exclusive categories."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_phone#Difference_between_smartphones_and_feature_phones

So please explain what you are on about please
-- 
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88032

On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 28/01/2016 08:25, Bod wrote:
>> On 28/01/2016 03:17, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oppo Find 7
>>>> http://www.gsmarena.com/oppo_find_7-6214.php
>>>
>>> That's not an Android feature phone. Do you know the difference?
>>>
>> Then explain the difference to me. I can open apps with gestures etc.
>> I class most modern mobile phones these days as smart.
>> I've never heard of a mobile phone being advertised as a feature phone.
>>
> Just checked and found this:
>
> *Feature phone*
> noun
> plural noun: feature phones
> a mobile phone that incorporates features such as the ability to access 
> the Internet and store and play music but lacks the advanced 
> functionality of a smartphone.
>
> And this from Wikipedia:
>
> "Although a feature phone is a low-end device and a smartphone a 
> high-end one, there is no standard way of distinguishing them.[24][25] 
> Smartphone and feature phone are not mutually exclusive categories."
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_phone#Difference_between_smartphones_and_feature_phones
>
> So please explain what you are on about please

Keep reading and learning. You'll get there eventually - I have faith in
you!

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88036

On 28/01/2016 16:33, Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 28/01/2016 08:25, Bod wrote:
>>> On 28/01/2016 03:17, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oppo Find 7
>>>>> http://www.gsmarena.com/oppo_find_7-6214.php
>>>>
>>>> That's not an Android feature phone. Do you know the difference?
>>>>
>>> Then explain the difference to me. I can open apps with gestures etc.
>>> I class most modern mobile phones these days as smart.
>>> I've never heard of a mobile phone being advertised as a feature phone.
>>>
>> Just checked and found this:
>>
>> *Feature phone*
>> noun
>> plural noun: feature phones
>> a mobile phone that incorporates features such as the ability to access
>> the Internet and store and play music but lacks the advanced
>> functionality of a smartphone.
>>
>> And this from Wikipedia:
>>
>> "Although a feature phone is a low-end device and a smartphone a
>> high-end one, there is no standard way of distinguishing them.[24][25]
>> Smartphone and feature phone are not mutually exclusive categories."
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_phone#Difference_between_smartphones_and_feature_phones
>>
>> So please explain what you are on about please
>
> Keep reading and learning. You'll get there eventually - I have faith in
> you!
>
 >So no explanation then.
I'd like you to explain. The facts don't agree with you.
-- 
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88134

On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
alt.comp.freeware
alt.comp.os.windows-10

JR,

Would you please not cross post to troll groups?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88137

On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> alt.comp.freeware
> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>
> JR,
>
> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?

Not to rain on your parade, but I'm not the one who cross posted this
thread. I don't make a habit of cross posting bullshit initial posts to
disparate groups, and my posting history shows that. And it's
interesting you aren't complaining to any of the other (50 or so?)
people who replied. Anyway, if you really want to bitch and moan about
it, direct your criticism to the person who actually is responsible:

Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 02:46:37 +0100
From: Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org>
References: <d688a41c55708cf719bd3857f7edab73@remailer.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1
Users Twice a Day
Message-ID: <c9cb51b04769047aa120e415e4490172@hoi-polloi.org>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.hacker,
alt.privacy.anon-server
Path:
uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!peer01.fr7!news.highwinds-media.com!ecngs!testfeeder.ecngs.de
!78.46.240.70.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!sewer!news.dizum.net
!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 194.109.206.211
X-Received-Bytes: 2211
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1892737878
Lines: 29
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.comp.freeware:884635
alt.comp.os.windows-10:14192 alt.hacker:206099
alt.privacy.anon-server:468608

Enjoy that.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88332

On 1/29/16   PDT 7:28 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> alt.comp.freeware
>> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>>
>> JR,
>>
>> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?
>
> Not to rain on your parade, but I'm not the one who cross posted this
> thread. I don't make a habit of cross posting bullshit initial posts to
> disparate groups, and my posting history shows that. And it's
> interesting you aren't complaining to any of the other (50 or so?)
> people who replied. Anyway, if you really want to bitch and moan about
> it, direct your criticism to the person who actually is responsible:

You are responsible for your posts. Simple concept.

Regardless of "who started it", you are perpetuating a troll thread. Try 
dismounting from your high horse long enough to admit you're wrong 
headed about this one.

-- 
I know that you believe you understood what you think I said, but I'm 
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88339

John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 1/29/16   PDT 7:28 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> alt.comp.freeware
>>> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>>> 
>>> JR,
>>> 
>>> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?
>> 
>> Not to rain on your parade, but I'm not the one who cross posted this
>> thread. I don't make a habit of cross posting bullshit initial posts to
>> disparate groups, and my posting history shows that. And it's
>> interesting you aren't complaining to any of the other (50 or so?)
>> people who replied. Anyway, if you really want to bitch and moan about
>> it, direct your criticism to the person who actually is responsible:
> 
> You are responsible for your posts. Simple concept.

Apparently one completely lost on you, since you are posting here as well. 

> Regardless of "who started it", you are perpetuating a troll thread.

As are you. As is every other person who has responded. Yet you aren't
complaining about your own posts or theirs, hypocrite.

> Try 
> dismounting from your high horse long enough to admit you're wrong 
> headed about this one.

High horse? I'm not the one criticizing others here. That would be you,
asshole. 

If you dislike my posts, your recourse is to simply kill them; otherwise
you can eat shit. I don't make posts to the alt.comp.freeware and
alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroups, which is easy for anyone to verify. The
only reason you are seeing this post is because some dipshit troll decided
to crosspost this thread to the Apple newsgroups. If you have a problem
with that, complaining to others is just plain foolish.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88399

On 1/31/16   PDT 1:27 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
> John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 1/29/16   PDT 7:28 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> alt.comp.freeware
>>>> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>>>>
>>>> JR,
>>>>
>>>> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?
>>>
>>> Not to rain on your parade, but I'm not the one who cross posted this
>>> thread. I don't make a habit of cross posting bullshit initial posts to
>>> disparate groups, and my posting history shows that. And it's
>>> interesting you aren't complaining to any of the other (50 or so?)
>>> people who replied. Anyway, if you really want to bitch and moan about
>>> it, direct your criticism to the person who actually is responsible:
>>
>> You are responsible for your posts. Simple concept.
>
> Apparently one completely lost on you, since you are posting here as well.
>
>> Regardless of "who started it", you are perpetuating a troll thread.
>
> As are you. As is every other person who has responded. Yet you aren't
> complaining about your own posts or theirs, hypocrite.
>
>> Try
>> dismounting from your high horse long enough to admit you're wrong
>> headed about this one.
>
> High horse? I'm not the one criticizing others here. That would be you,
> asshole.
>
> If you dislike my posts, your recourse is to simply kill them; otherwise
> you can eat shit. I don't make posts to the alt.comp.freeware and
> alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroups, which is easy for anyone to verify. The
> only reason you are seeing this post is because some dipshit troll decided
> to crosspost this thread to the Apple newsgroups. If you have a problem
> with that, complaining to others is just plain foolish.

I am pointing this out to you. You've replied endlessly to cross posted 
trolls.
I've removed those groups in my request to you to be mindful of where 
you are posting, but it seems you don't care to grasp that. It looks 
like you've encouraged one troll to come to this NG to post directly, 
which is fine, but just so you know.

Name calling is so juvenile.

Have a nice day!

-- 
Edmund Blackadder and Baldrick converse:

EB: "First Name?"
B: "I'm not sure."
EB: "Come on, you MUST have a first name."
B: "It might be 'Sod Off'."
EB: "Sod Off??"
B: "Yeah, when I was a young lad playing in the gutter, I used to say to 
all the other snipes, "Hello, my name's Baldrick". And they'd say, "Yes 
we know, Sod Off, Baldrick"

- Blackadder and Baldrick filling out an application form.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88425

John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 1/31/16   PDT 1:27 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/29/16   PDT 7:28 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> alt.comp.freeware
>>>>> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>>>>> 
>>>>> JR,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?
>>>> 
>>>> Not to rain on your parade, but I'm not the one who cross posted this
>>>> thread. I don't make a habit of cross posting bullshit initial posts to
>>>> disparate groups, and my posting history shows that. And it's
>>>> interesting you aren't complaining to any of the other (50 or so?)
>>>> people who replied. Anyway, if you really want to bitch and moan about
>>>> it, direct your criticism to the person who actually is responsible:
>>> 
>>> You are responsible for your posts. Simple concept.
>> 
>> Apparently one completely lost on you, since you are posting here as well.
>> 
>>> Regardless of "who started it", you are perpetuating a troll thread.
>> 
>> As are you. As is every other person who has responded. Yet you aren't
>> complaining about your own posts or theirs, hypocrite.
>> 
>>> Try
>>> dismounting from your high horse long enough to admit you're wrong
>>> headed about this one.
>> 
>> High horse? I'm not the one criticizing others here. That would be you,
>> asshole.
>> 
>> If you dislike my posts, your recourse is to simply kill them; otherwise
>> you can eat shit. I don't make posts to the alt.comp.freeware and
>> alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroups, which is easy for anyone to verify. The
>> only reason you are seeing this post is because some dipshit troll decided
>> to crosspost this thread to the Apple newsgroups. If you have a problem
>> with that, complaining to others is just plain foolish.
> 
> I am pointing this out to you. You've replied endlessly to cross posted 
> trolls.

So have you. In fact here you are still doing it.

> I've removed those groups in my request to you to be mindful of where 
> you are posting, but it seems you don't care to grasp that. 

Yet you didn't bother in your previous replies. Very interesting.

> It looks 
> like you've encouraged one troll to come to this NG to post directly, 
> which is fine, but just so you know.

Any number of replies (some of which were made by you, some by others)
could have caused that, yet you see fit to focus solely on mine while
ignoring your own and others.

> Name calling is so juvenile.

Hypocrite isn't a name. If you don't want to be called an asshole, stop
being one.

> Have a nice day!

After you.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88639

On 2/1/16   PDT 9:16 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
> John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:

>> I am pointing this out to you. You've replied endlessly to cross posted
>> trolls.
>
> So have you. In fact here you are still doing it.

Not so. You apparently haven't noticed that the troll groups have been 
removed in my posts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88353

On 2016-01-31, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 1/29/16   PDT 7:28 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> alt.comp.freeware
>>> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>>>
>>> JR,
>>>
>>> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?
>>
>> Not to rain on your parade, but I'm not the one who cross posted this
>> thread. I don't make a habit of cross posting bullshit initial posts to
>> disparate groups, and my posting history shows that. And it's
>> interesting you aren't complaining to any of the other (50 or so?)
>> people who replied. Anyway, if you really want to bitch and moan about
>> it, direct your criticism to the person who actually is responsible:
>
> You are responsible for your posts. Simple concept.
>
> Regardless of "who started it", you are perpetuating a troll thread. Try 
> dismounting from your high horse long enough to admit you're wrong 
> headed about this one.

JR *is* a troll… Only a minor league and rather ineffective one, but a troll
nonetheless.


-- 
Today is Sweetmorn, the 31st day of Chaos in the YOLD 3182
                  I don't have an attitude problem.
    If you have a problem with my attitude, that's your problem.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88371

On 2016-01-31, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
> On 2016-01-31, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 1/29/16   PDT 7:28 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> alt.comp.freeware
>>>> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>>>>
>>>> JR,
>>>>
>>>> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?
>>>
>>> Not to rain on your parade, but I'm not the one who cross posted this
>>> thread. I don't make a habit of cross posting bullshit initial posts to
>>> disparate groups, and my posting history shows that. And it's
>>> interesting you aren't complaining to any of the other (50 or so?)
>>> people who replied. Anyway, if you really want to bitch and moan about
>>> it, direct your criticism to the person who actually is responsible:
>>
>> You are responsible for your posts. Simple concept.
>>
>> Regardless of "who started it", you are perpetuating a troll thread. Try 
>> dismounting from your high horse long enough to admit you're wrong 
>> headed about this one.
>
> JR *is* a troll… Only a minor league and rather ineffective one, but a troll
> nonetheless.

That's rich coming from you, a well-known troll in the Apple news groups...

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88249

On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> alt.comp.freeware
> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>
> JR,
>
> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?

That's what trolls do.


-- 
Today is Sweetmorn, the 31st day of Chaos in the YOLD 3182
                  I don't have an attitude problem.
    If you have a problem with my attitude, that's your problem.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#88278

On 2016-01-31, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
> On 2016-01-30, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 1/28/16   PDT 8:33 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-28, Bod <bodron57@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> alt.comp.freeware
>> alt.comp.os.windows-10
>>
>> JR,
>>
>> Would you please not cross post to troll groups?
>
> That's what trolls do.

The record clearly shows I don't cross post to disparate news groups,
you silly fools. I don't troll your silly news groups. In fact, I
haven't *ever* made an initial post to alt.comp.freeware of
alt.comp.os.windows-10. It's interesting that you haven't chastised the
other (50 or so?) people who responded to this cross posted thread. Next
time direct your bitching and moaning to the OP who actually did the
initial cross posting, dumb ass.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system

csiph-web