Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #81484 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Davoud <star@sky.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-04 20:40 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-10-10 11:17 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 98 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Safe to Delete Photos.app? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-10-04 20:40 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-04 20:48 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 21:25 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-04 21:31 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-10-04 22:10 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-05 00:29 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-10-04 22:36 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-05 23:14 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 02:47 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-05 23:14 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-05 19:15 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-06 13:05 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-10-07 12:07 +1300
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-07 00:30 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-06 20:38 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-07 00:37 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-07 06:39 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-07 12:31 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-10-07 23:40 +1300
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-06 21:01 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-07 01:03 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-06 21:05 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-07 01:10 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-06 21:18 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-07 01:25 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-07 00:45 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? "Andre G. Isaak" <agisaak@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 20:28 -0600
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-07 08:42 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-10-07 06:58 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-07 12:59 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-07 17:10 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-07 12:52 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-07 18:49 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-10-08 13:14 +1300
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-08 08:44 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2015-10-08 08:08 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-08 13:42 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-08 16:25 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-08 15:49 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-08 16:29 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-06 21:05 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-07 01:12 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-07 00:46 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-07 00:41 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-08 02:15 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 19:41 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-08 02:58 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 20:44 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-09 03:57 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-08 21:04 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-09 01:51 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-10-09 06:27 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-09 14:31 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-09 17:38 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-09 13:49 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-09 18:06 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-09 15:15 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 15:21 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-10-11 16:32 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-07 23:00 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-07 21:01 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-08 00:13 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-08 08:57 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-08 12:19 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-08 13:44 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-08 13:54 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-08 11:05 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-08 14:11 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-08 11:23 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-08 20:25 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-08 16:41 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-08 14:28 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-08 14:31 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-08 16:09 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-10-08 22:27 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-10-09 12:09 +1300
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-08 17:06 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-10-09 14:31 +1300
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-08 19:06 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-07 23:00 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-08 17:26 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-06 16:18 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-05 19:20 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-05 23:32 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-10-06 14:17 +1300
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-06 01:26 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-10-04 20:07 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-05 17:18 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-10-05 20:50 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-10-06 01:00 +0000
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-10-06 13:09 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-06 19:10 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-10-06 16:51 -0700
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-10-07 12:53 +1300
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-06 23:20 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-10-07 23:40 +1300
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-10-07 12:50 -0400
Re: Safe to Delete Photos.app? Electric Comet <electric-comet@mail.invalid> - 2015-10-10 11:17 -0700
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 21:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <061020152105568936%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #82123 |
In article <i4SdnRas79xH84nLnZ2dnUU7-SWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote: > >> Computer owner decides. It certainly isn't dumb. No GP computer should > >> be configured so that GP apps can cause a failure if they are removed. > >> Photos is not part of the OS. > > > > Yes it is, according to Apple. You cannot delete or modify Photos.app in > > El Capitan without disabling or bypassing SIP. > > I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps > (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they > can't be removed. it's 50meg. who cares. ignore it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 01:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7j9spF9dd6U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #82127 |
On 2015-10-07, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <i4SdnRas79xH84nLnZ2dnUU7-SWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne ><alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote: > >> >> Computer owner decides. It certainly isn't dumb. No GP computer should >> >> be configured so that GP apps can cause a failure if they are removed. >> >> Photos is not part of the OS. >> > >> > Yes it is, according to Apple. You cannot delete or modify Photos.app in >> > El Capitan without disabling or bypassing SIP. >> >> I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps >> (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they >> can't be removed. > > it's 50meg. who cares. ignore it. I gotta say, I don't understand why this is such a big deal either. If I didn't ever want it to launch, I'd remove execute permissions from the app so it wouldn't ever launch. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 00:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5614a37c$0$15560$c3e8da3$9deca2c3@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #82129 |
On 2015-10-06 21:12, Jolly Roger wrote: > I didn't ever want it to launch, I'd remove execute permissions from the > app so it wouldn't ever launch. If the app is SIP protected, you cannot change its permissions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 00:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5614a26a$0$9311$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #82123 |
On 2015-10-06 21:01, Alan Browne wrote: > I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps > (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they > can't be removed. Apple makes sure one can't hack/patch one of its applications. Unfortunatly, preventing any modifications to the App also prevents its deletion. Out of curiosity: if sudo and/or root no longer have access to the full system, is OS-X still "Unix certified" ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 02:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7m1u5FubmvU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #82188 |
On 2015-10-07, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 2015-10-06 21:01, Alan Browne wrote:
>
>> I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps
>> (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they
>> can't be removed.
>
> Apple makes sure one can't hack/patch one of its applications.
> Unfortunatly, preventing any modifications to the App also prevents its
> deletion.
>
> Out of curiosity: if sudo and/or root no longer have access to the full
> system, is OS-X still "Unix certified" ?
OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken.
--
I don't have an attitude problem. If you have a problem with my
attitude, that's your problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 19:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D23B25D0.5F738%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #82470 |
On 10/7/15, 7:15 PM, in article d7m1u5FubmvU2@mid.individual.net, "Huge" <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > On 2015-10-07, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >> On 2015-10-06 21:01, Alan Browne wrote: >> >>> I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps >>> (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they >>> can't be removed. >> >> Apple makes sure one can't hack/patch one of its applications. >> Unfortunatly, preventing any modifications to the App also prevents its >> deletion. >> >> Out of curiosity: if sudo and/or root no longer have access to the full >> system, is OS-X still "Unix certified" ? > > OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken. > OS X is a certified UNIX. Hard to get more compatible than that! But, yes, HFS+ is outdated and it would be good to have it be replaced. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 02:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7m4fbFm2mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #82471 |
On 2015-10-08, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 10/7/15, 7:15 PM, in article d7m1u5FubmvU2@mid.individual.net, "Huge"
><Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-07, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
>>> On 2015-10-06 21:01, Alan Browne wrote:
>>>
>>>> I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps
>>>> (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they
>>>> can't be removed.
>>>
>>> Apple makes sure one can't hack/patch one of its applications.
>>> Unfortunatly, preventing any modifications to the App also prevents its
>>> deletion.
>>>
>>> Out of curiosity: if sudo and/or root no longer have access to the full
>>> system, is OS-X still "Unix certified" ?
>>
>> OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken.
>>
> OS X is a certified UNIX.
I don't give a toss what pieces of paper there are.
--
I don't have an attitude problem. If you have a problem with my
attitude, that's your problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 20:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D23B3497.5F74A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #82474 |
On 10/7/15, 7:58 PM, in article d7m4fbFm2mU1@mid.individual.net, "Huge" <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > On 2015-10-08, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/7/15, 7:15 PM, in article d7m1u5FubmvU2@mid.individual.net, "Huge" >> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-07, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-06 21:01, Alan Browne wrote: >>>> >>>>> I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps >>>>> (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they >>>>> can't be removed. >>>> >>>> Apple makes sure one can't hack/patch one of its applications. >>>> Unfortunatly, preventing any modifications to the App also prevents its >>>> deletion. >>>> >>>> Out of curiosity: if sudo and/or root no longer have access to the full >>>> system, is OS-X still "Unix certified" ? >>> >>> OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken. >>> >> OS X is a certified UNIX. > > I don't give a toss what pieces of paper there are. So you make a claim about what OS X is or is not, and do not care what the facts are. Once we get to that point it is quite clear there is no value to your views. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 03:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #82481 |
On 2015-10-08, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 10/7/15, 7:58 PM, in article d7m4fbFm2mU1@mid.individual.net, "Huge"
><Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-10-08, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/7/15, 7:15 PM, in article d7m1u5FubmvU2@mid.individual.net, "Huge"
>>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-10-07, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
>>>>> On 2015-10-06 21:01, Alan Browne wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps
>>>>>> (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they
>>>>>> can't be removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apple makes sure one can't hack/patch one of its applications.
>>>>> Unfortunatly, preventing any modifications to the App also prevents its
>>>>> deletion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Out of curiosity: if sudo and/or root no longer have access to the full
>>>>> system, is OS-X still "Unix certified" ?
>>>>
>>>> OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken.
>>>>
>>> OS X is a certified UNIX.
>>
>> I don't give a toss what pieces of paper there are.
>
> So you make a claim about what OS X is or is not, and do not care what the
> facts are. Once we get to that point it is quite clear there is no value to
> your views.
Says the man with the arsewipe sig.
FOAD, there's a good little moron.
*plonk*
Fucking Apple fanbois.
--
I don't have an attitude problem. If you have a problem with my
attitude, that's your problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 21:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D23C8ACF.5F9D3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #82680 |
On 10/8/15, 8:57 PM, in article d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net, "Huge" <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > On 2015-10-08, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/7/15, 7:58 PM, in article d7m4fbFm2mU1@mid.individual.net, "Huge" >> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-08, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/7/15, 7:15 PM, in article d7m1u5FubmvU2@mid.individual.net, "Huge" >>>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-10-07, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >>>>>> On 2015-10-06 21:01, Alan Browne wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I meant that it should not be so designed. There is nothing about apps >>>>>>> (for fricking photos!) that should be deeply hooked to the OS that they >>>>>>> can't be removed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Apple makes sure one can't hack/patch one of its applications. >>>>>> Unfortunatly, preventing any modifications to the App also prevents its >>>>>> deletion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Out of curiosity: if sudo and/or root no longer have access to the full >>>>>> system, is OS-X still "Unix certified" ? >>>>> >>>>> OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken. >>>>> >>>> OS X is a certified UNIX. >>> >>> I don't give a toss what pieces of paper there are. >> >> So you make a claim about what OS X is or is not, and do not care what the >> facts are. Once we get to that point it is quite clear there is no value to >> your views. > > Says the man with the arsewipe sig. > > FOAD, there's a good little moron. > > *plonk* > > Fucking Apple fanbois. Yeah, such a "fanboi" I noted OS X is a certified UNIX. Just insane! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 01:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #82680 |
In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken. > >>>> > >>> OS X is a certified UNIX. > >> > >> I don't give a toss what pieces of paper there are. > > > > So you make a claim about what OS X is or is not, and do not care what the > > facts are. Once we get to that point it is quite clear there is no value to > > your views. > > Says the man with the arsewipe sig. > > FOAD, there's a good little moron. > > *plonk* > > Fucking Apple fanbois. os x being certified unix has *nothing* to do with apple. it's a separate entity entirely.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 06:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn1enmp.2q0t.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #82710 |
In message <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge > <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken. >> >>>> >> >>> OS X is a certified UNIX. >> >> >> >> I don't give a toss what pieces of paper there are. >> > >> > So you make a claim about what OS X is or is not, and do not care what the >> > facts are. Once we get to that point it is quite clear there is no value to >> > your views. >> >> Says the man with the arsewipe sig. >> >> FOAD, there's a good little moron. >> >> *plonk* >> >> Fucking Apple fanbois. > os x being certified unix has *nothing* to do with apple. Huge doesn't understand facts. -- Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 14:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7q1eqF92iU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #82717 |
On 2015-10-09, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> In message <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid>
> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge
>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> OS-X never was 100% Unix compatible - HFS+ is very broken.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>> OS X is a certified UNIX.
>>> >>
>>> >> I don't give a toss what pieces of paper there are.
>>> >
>>> > So you make a claim about what OS X is or is not, and do not care what the
>>> > facts are. Once we get to that point it is quite clear there is no value to
>>> > your views.
>>>
>>> Says the man with the arsewipe sig.
>>>
>>> FOAD, there's a good little moron.
>>>
>>> *plonk*
>>>
>>> Fucking Apple fanbois.
>
>> os x being certified unix has *nothing* to do with apple.
>
> Huge doesn't understand facts.
Huge has been supporting Unix systems for over 40 years, has a firm grasp of the politics behind system certification and thinks that Apple fanbois are sad wankstains. Now FOAD. I'm sure there's a Steve Jobs circle jerk waiting for you somewhere.
--
I don't have an attitude problem. If you have a problem with my
attitude, that's your problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 17:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7qcddF25gvU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #82737 |
On 2015-10-09, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > On 2015-10-09, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: >> In message <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid> >> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge >>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >> >> Huge doesn't understand facts. > > Huge has been supporting Unix systems for over 40 years, has a firm > grasp of the politics behind system certification and thinks that > Apple fanbois are sad wankstains. Now FOAD. I'm sure there's a Steve > Jobs circle jerk waiting for you somewhere. Awww, wittwe giwl got her feewings huwt? How adorable! -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 13:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <i-SdnWglXbanY4rLnZ2dnUU7-Q2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #82786 |
On 2015-10-09 13:38, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2015-10-09, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >> On 2015-10-09, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: >>> In message <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid> >>> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge >>>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> Huge doesn't understand facts. >> >> Huge has been supporting Unix systems for over 40 years, has a firm >> grasp of the politics behind system certification and thinks that >> Apple fanbois are sad wankstains. Now FOAD. I'm sure there's a Steve >> Jobs circle jerk waiting for you somewhere. > > Awww, wittwe giwl got her feewings huwt? How adorable! Now, now, JR, if you make cutsie poo comments like that, it just encourages them because they crave attention. Over 40 years of that has to end at some point or it'll never find a husband.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 18:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7qe1bF25gvU13@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #82788 |
On 2015-10-09, Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote: > On 2015-10-09 13:38, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2015-10-09, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >>> On 2015-10-09, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: >>>> In message <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid> >>>> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge >>>>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> Huge doesn't understand facts. >>> >>> Huge has been supporting Unix systems for over 40 years, has a firm >>> grasp of the politics behind system certification and thinks that >>> Apple fanbois are sad wankstains. Now FOAD. I'm sure there's a Steve >>> Jobs circle jerk waiting for you somewhere. >> >> Awww, wittwe giwl got her feewings huwt? How adorable! > > Now, now, JR, if you make cutsie poo comments like that, it just > encourages them because they crave attention. Over 40 years of that has > to end at some point or it'll never find a husband. My apologies for prolonging the inevitable... : ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 15:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <NtKdnWUdupKoj4XLnZ2dnUU7-YXOydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #82798 |
On 2015-10-09 14:06, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2015-10-09, Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote: >> On 2015-10-09 13:38, Jolly Roger wrote: >>> On 2015-10-09, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-09, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: >>>>> In message <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid> >>>>> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge >>>>>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Huge doesn't understand facts. >>>> >>>> Huge has been supporting Unix systems for over 40 years, has a firm >>>> grasp of the politics behind system certification and thinks that >>>> Apple fanbois are sad wankstains. Now FOAD. I'm sure there's a Steve >>>> Jobs circle jerk waiting for you somewhere. >>> >>> Awww, wittwe giwl got her feewings huwt? How adorable! >> >> Now, now, JR, if you make cutsie poo comments like that, it just >> encourages them because they crave attention. Over 40 years of that has >> to end at some point or it'll never find a husband. > > My apologies for prolonging the inevitable... : ) More like evitable, but, whatever...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 15:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mv940r$724$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #82798 |
On 2015-10-09 18:06:36 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said: > On 2015-10-09, Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote: >> On 2015-10-09 13:38, Jolly Roger wrote: >>> On 2015-10-09, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-09, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: >>>>> In message <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid> >>>>> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge >>>>>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Huge doesn't understand facts. >>>> >>>> Huge has been supporting Unix systems for over 40 years, has a firm >>>> grasp of the politics behind system certification and thinks that >>>> Apple fanbois are sad wankstains. Now FOAD. I'm sure there's a Steve >>>> Jobs circle jerk waiting for you somewhere. >>> >>> Awww, wittwe giwl got her feewings huwt? How adorable! >> >> Now, now, JR, if you make cutsie poo comments like that, it just >> encourages them because they crave attention. Over 40 years of that has >> to end at some point or it'll never find a husband. > > My apologies for prolonging the inevitable... : ) I've found that people who call themselves "Huge", rarely are... -- "A man's face is his autobiography. A woman's face is her work of fiction." -Oscar Wilde
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-11 16:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7vh8tFcfr0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #82834 |
On 2015-10-09, FPP <fredp151@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-10-09 18:06:36 +0000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> said:
>
>> On 2015-10-09, Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote:
>>> On 2015-10-09 13:38, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2015-10-09, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 2015-10-09, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>>>>>> In message <091020150151071220%nospam@nospam.invalid>
>>>>>> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <d7os8tFllrvU3@mid.individual.net>, Huge
>>>>>>> <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Huge doesn't understand facts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Huge has been supporting Unix systems for over 40 years, has a firm
>>>>> grasp of the politics behind system certification and thinks that
>>>>> Apple fanbois are sad wankstains. Now FOAD. I'm sure there's a Steve
>>>>> Jobs circle jerk waiting for you somewhere.
>>>>
>>>> Awww, wittwe giwl got her feewings huwt? How adorable!
>>>
>>> Now, now, JR, if you make cutsie poo comments like that, it just
>>> encourages them because they crave attention. Over 40 years of that has
>>> to end at some point or it'll never find a husband.
>>
>> My apologies for prolonging the inevitable... : )
>
> I've found that people who call themselves "Huge", rarely are...
But then, I think you're a cunt. And chances are, I'm right
--
I don't have an attitude problem. If you have a problem with my
attitude, that's your problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 23:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <071020152300567000%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #82471 |
In article <D23B25D0.5F738%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > But, yes, HFS+ is outdated and it would be good to have it be replaced. it's been updated over the years and works just fine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web