Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #144909
| From | Andrew <andrew@spam.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown |
| Date | 2024-10-03 05:50 +0000 |
| Organization | BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) |
| Message-ID | <vdlbal$bph$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <vdhgk5$1i1rs$1@solani.org> <vdhk7j$2s1s5$1@dont-email.me> <lm41ltF34keU1@mid.individual.net> <vdka0d$30l5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <lm60peFcfcgU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Jolly Roger wrote on 2 Oct 2024 22:46:06 GMT : > Only you Apple zealots dispute facts that are well publicized. > > Only Arlen and badgolferman think repeated unsubstantiated lies are > "facts that are well publicized". Why not just say, "Yeah, Apple iPhone batteries sure are puny"? You can't bring yourself to say that because it's a religious thing. Not only can't you accept simple facts everyone knows, but you spend endless hours *disputing* what is simply a well-known fact about iPhones. The fact is, iPhone batteries *are* puny. >> Such as the fact that Apple's iPhones have smaller batteries than most >> Androids of similar size & price range. Far smaller batteries, in fact. > > iPhones have battery run times that are in the top 10. If there are any adults reading this response, do you see how these strange religious zealots fixate on completely meaningless metrics in order to not simply say "Yeah, Apple iPhone batteries sure are puny"? To prove why their metric is almost meaningless, I already gave an example prior showing the initial battery capacity and charge cycles matters more. But I could give other illustrative examples which prove that the length of time a battery lasts on the first day is almost meaningless in terms of how long the battery will last over time. Let's take a comparison of a Lithium Iron Phosphate battery such as the Franklin home batteries to a Tesla 3 powerwall standard Lithium-ion battery. What's the life of the Franklin battery compared to that of the Tesla? Decades longer, right. And yet, they both power the same amount on the first day of use. That's just an example, but the point is these zealots dispute everything they don't like about Apple products - which is pretty much everything. This fixation the Apple religious zealots have with marketing metrics instead of scientific metrics is part of why they're so very strange. > Instead, Arlen wants everyone to focus on the relatively meaningless > metric of battery size. After years of saying the same thing, you *still* can't understand that size isn't what I focus on - but overall battery lifetime. Why do you think the EU forced Apple to upgrade their batteries JR? Apple couldn't afford the word to get out that there wasn't a single iPhone in the world that met even the bar minimum standard for overall lifetime. > what most normal people care about is runtime. The EU spec that *all* iPhone batteries failed, JR, was overall lifetime. The iPhone 15 battery increase barely made the EU lifetime spec, JR. Meanwhile most Androids *double* the minimum EU lifetime spec, JR. *You zealots dispute everything you don't know; which is everything.*
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-09-30 21:00 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> - 2024-09-30 22:27 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-09-30 23:58 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-10-01 11:35 -0700
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 18:56 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2024-10-02 04:49 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 20:21 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2024-10-02 22:46 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-03 05:50 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2024-10-03 15:42 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-03 20:24 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2024-10-04 16:23 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-01 23:03 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-10-01 18:19 -0700
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown RocketSurgeon <48forward@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 10:59 -0700
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 20:25 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> - 2024-11-15 11:17 -0500
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-15 08:22 -0800
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrews <andrews@spam.net> - 2024-11-15 18:04 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-15 11:51 -0800
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-11-15 15:55 -0500
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Andrews <andrews@spam.net> - 2024-11-15 21:20 +0000
Re: iFixit iPhone 16 Pro teardown Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-11-21 15:10 -0800
csiph-web