Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #86504
| From | ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system, alt.windows7.general |
| References | <_aqdnX7pDonIfOHLnZ2dnUU7-S2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <n5jbud$hud$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <urednbKi_tNk6eDLnZ2dnUU7-UWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-12-25 10:55 -0600 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
> > I'm having problems with my 2 MS partitions in my external USB 2 TB WD
> > Green HDD. I wanted to have 2 encrypted partitions (W7 EE SP1's
> > BitLocker NTFS and HFS[Time Machine and manual Mac files]) and an
> > unencrypted FAT (tried both FAT32 and exFAT). I had no problems
> > (mak/creat)ing them.
> >
> > The problem is that Mac OS X v10.10.5 (Yosemite) thinks I have 2 FAT
> > drives (only 1 should exist while other is NTFS (assuming cannot be read
> > due to its BitLocker encryption which is fine to me)). If I connect it
> > to a W7 laptop/notebook, then only FAT can be seen.
> >
> > I tried reformatting the encrypted BitLocker NTFS to unencrypted FAT in
> > Mac OS X's Disk Utility which can be seen in Mac, but W7 does't see it.
> > I tried letting W7's Disk Management make this unallocated partition to
> > a new simple volume (NTFS or exFAT -- tried both), but it said "The
> > operation you selected will convert the selected basic disk(s) to
> > dynamic disk(s). If you convert the disk(s) to dynamic, you will not be
> > able to stat installed operating systems from any volume on the disk(s)
> > (except the current boot volume). Are you sure you want to continue?" I
> > tried Yes and its Virtual Disk Manager said "The operation is not
> > supported by the object." :(
> >
> > I tried deleting all partitions and told Mac OS X's Disk Utility to
> > recreate the 3 partitions (unencrypted HFS+ & 2 MS FAT partitions) from
> > scratch. Everything was fine when I checked between machines. I told W7
> > to format a FAT partition into NTFS with BitLocker encryption. After it
> > was done, I rechecked with Mac OS X. Partitions were fine (yes, I know
> > Mac can't read BitLocker encryptions so that partition stays hidden). I
> > told Mac OS X to do a very long encrypted Time Machine backup and
> > manually copy some files into this encrypted HFS+ partition for hours.
> > After that, I went back to W7 and it can't see my BitLocker partition
> > (unallocated)!
> >
> > http://i.imgur.com/tJ5wWz6.gif and http://i.imgur.com/KBwAEct.gif and
> > for my 2 screen (shot/capture)s from both machine with the same external
> > USB HDD connected.
> >
> > What's going on? Does having 2 different encrypted partitions not work
> > with each other? Or am I doing something wrong? :(
> >
> > Thank you in advance. :)
> The disk in question is GPT.
> It's possible that an unallocated section of the disk,
> shows up as a "partition" under GPT. And that's where
> two FAT come from.
> I would try to apply labels to the partitions, so you
> have more landmarks when you're lost. For example,
> my C: partition might be "Win7" or "Win10" depending
> on what I was using. And since not all display routines
> actually have the ability to display the label, I also
> place a zero-sized file "IM_WINXP.txt" in the root
> of the partition. In that example, it allows me to unambiguously
> identify the partition based on contents. I need that if
> using the Kaspersky rescue CD (with AV scanner) and I want
> to be absolutely sure that the E: partition it has identified,
> is in fact my WinXP C: partition. By putting a single
> expressively named file in the partition at the root level,
> I can figure out where I am later.
> Always leave bread crumbs, for later.
I did that with text files and volume labels since I easily get
confused. I find it weird that Mac doesn't see them from Windows. And
then the same in reversed when I make them in Mac and WIndows can't see
them.
> *******
> I like the Cygwin version of disktype.
> It's actually a small utility. It is available as source code.
> http://disktype.sourceforge.net/
> Being lazy, I don't really want to waste time building it
> from source. So I try to find "pre-baked" versions.
Where did you get those compiled binaries? I don't see them?
--
Merry Christmas/Season's Greetings/:) Holidays & May The Force Be With U!
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
( ) ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-12-25 00:25 -0600
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-12-25 07:39 +0000
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-12-25 10:47 -0600
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-12-25 16:51 +0000
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-12-25 12:06 -0500
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-12-25 11:42 -0600
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-12-25 13:00 -0500
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-12-25 10:13 -0800
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-12-25 13:17 -0500
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-12-25 10:22 -0800
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-12-25 13:23 -0500
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2015-12-25 10:36 -0800
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-12-25 18:23 +0000
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-12-25 07:16 -0500
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-12-25 10:55 -0600
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-12-25 12:18 -0500
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-12-25 17:56 -0500
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-12-25 23:31 +0000
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-12-26 21:21 -0600
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-12-28 19:09 -0600
Re: Can't have both encrypted Mac's HFS+ & MS W7 EE SP1's BitLocker NTFS? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-12-28 21:09 -0600
csiph-web