Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #103904
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!kreme.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: APFS , a second look |
| Date | Sun, 9 Apr 2017 18:36:50 -0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Miskatonic U |
| Lines | 28 |
| Message-ID | <slrnoekvvq.1o7k.g.kreme@snow.local> (permalink) |
| References | <58e9b85f$0$13183$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 9 Apr 2017 18:36:50 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | kreme.eternal-september.org; posting-host="03ac05a7842175d5ed7ad1cdfee74b81"; logging-data="21678"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PWmVjrrAfwcfHxaQKnGeY" |
| User-Agent | slrn/1.0.2 (Darwin) |
| X-Face | )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:O/n5e+t5yT37bCmSxbqbKo8a+r0= |
| X-Clacks-Overhead | GNU Terry Pratchett |
| Mail-Copies-To | nobody |
| Xref | csiph.com misc.phone.mobile.iphone:99476 comp.sys.mac.system:103904 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
In message <58e9b85f$0$13183$c3e8da3$cc4fe22d@news.astraweb.com> JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > With hindsight I am watching the WWDC presentation on Apple File System > once again. > Some of the stime that comes out on second watch: > -Will be deployed from Apple Watch to the MacPro. We all got that the first time. It was discussed here at the time. > -HFS+ was limited to single thread for updates of B-trees, requiring > locks and process wait for acquisition of lock. (OK on single processor > systems, not so much on multi core ones. Yes, we know that too. > partitioning very different: Not really, this is how CoreStorage has always worked. > Yosemite and earlier will not recognize APFS. (this implies that El > Capitan will get update to support it). For values of "implies" that mean Apple specifically said 10.11 would get APFS support, it just won't be able to BOOT it. -- Don't just *do* something: *sit* there!
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
APFS , a second look JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-09 00:28 -0400 Re: APFS , a second look JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2017-04-09 00:55 -0400 Re: APFS , a second look Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2017-04-09 18:36 +0000
csiph-web